ArticleGenome biology and evolution2010
The effect of chaperonin buffering on protein evolution.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Quality Control is a Master Modulator of Molecular Evolution in Bacteria.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Expression divergence of BAG gene family in maize under heat stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone as a Global Modifier of the Genotype-Phenotype-Fitness Map: An Evolutionary Perspective.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Mutational robustness and the role of buffer genes in evolvability.The EMBO journal · 2024Review
- Viral Evolution Shaped by Host Proteostasis Networks.Annual review of virology · 2023Review
- Hsp90 is a potential risk factor for ovarian cancer prognosis: an evidence of a Chinese clinical center.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- DnaK response to expression of protein mutants is dependent on translation rate and stability.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis network profoundly shapes the protein sequence space accessible to HIV envelope.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Chaperonin Abundance Enhances Bacterial Fitness.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Chaperone client proteins evolve slower than non-client proteins.Functional & integrative genomics · 2020Article
- Evolution from Free-Living Bacteria to Endosymbionts of Insects: Genomic Changes and the Importance of the Chaperonin GroEL.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020Article
- Molecular Chaperones Accelerate the Evolution of Their Protein Clients in Yeast.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Metabolic Determinants of Enzyme Evolution in a Genome-Scale Bacterial Metabolic Network.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Hsp90 shapes protein and RNA evolution to balance trade-offs between protein stability and aggregation.Nature communications · 2018Article
- The versatile mutational "repertoire" of Escherichia coli GroEL, a multidomain chaperonin nanomachine.Biophysical reviews · 2018Review
- Article
- Chance and necessity in the genome evolution of endosymbiotic bacteria of insects.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Article
- Evolution of Chaperonin Gene Duplication in Stigonematalean Cyanobacteria (Subsection V).Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular chaperones are highly conserved and ubiquitous proteins that help other proteins in the cell to fold. Pioneering work by Rutherford and Lindquist suggested that the chaperone Hsp90 could buffer (i.e., suppress) phenotypic variation in its client proteins and that alternate periods of buffering and expression of these variants might be important in adaptive evolution. More recently, Tokuriki and Tawfik presented an explicit mechanism for chaperone-dependent evolution, in which the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL facilitated the folding of clients that had accumulated structurally destabilizing but neofunctionalizing mutations in the protein core. But how important an evolutionary force is chaperonin-mediated buffering in nature? Here, we address this question by modeling the per-residue evolutionary rate of the crystallized E. coli proteome, evaluating the relative contributions of chaperonin buffering, functional importance, and structural features such as residue contact density. Previous findings suggest an interaction between codon bias and GroEL in limiting the effects of misfolding errors. Our results suggest that the buffering of deleterious mutations by GroEL increases the evolutionary rate of client proteins. We then examine the evolutionary fate of GroEL clients in the Mycoplasmas, a group of bacteria containing the only known organisms that lack chaperonins. We show that GroEL was lost once in the common ancestor of a monophyletic subgroup of Mycoplasmas, and we evaluate the effect of this loss on the subsequent evolution of client proteins, providing evidence that client homologs in 11 Mycoplasma species have lost their obligate dependency on GroEL for folding. Our analyses indicate that individual molecules such as chaperonins can have significant effects on proteome evolution through their modulation of protein folding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.