Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20659893›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Circular permutation provides an evolutionary link between two families of calcium-dependent carbohydrate binding modules.

Cedric Montanier, James E Flint, David N Bolam, Hefang Xie, Ziyuan Liu, Artur Rogowski, David P Weiner, Supriya Ratnaparkhe, Didier Nurizzo, Shirley M Roberts and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic discovery of circular permutations across the protein universe using CIRPIN.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unique Fn3-like biosensor in σProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. How nature can exploit nonspecific catalytic and carbohydrate binding modules to create enzymatic specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cedric MontanierInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
James E Flint
David N Bolam
Hefang Xie
Ziyuan Liu
Artur Rogowski
David P Weiner
Supriya Ratnaparkhe
Didier Nurizzo
Shirley M Roberts
Johan P Turkenburg
Gideon J Davies
Harry J Gilbert
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of York · GBEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C005074/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial deconstruction of the plant cell wall is a critical biological process, which also provides important substrates for environmentally sustainable industries. Enzymes that hydrolyze the plant cell wall generally contain non-catalytic carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) that contribute to plant cell wall degradation. Here we report the biochemical properties and crystal structure of a family of CBMs (CBM60) that are located in xylanases. Uniquely, the proteins display broad ligand specificity, targeting xylans, galactans, and cellulose. Some of the CBM60s display enhanced affinity for their ligands through avidity effects mediated by protein dimerization. The crystal structure of vCBM60, displays a β-sandwich with the ligand binding site comprising a broad cleft formed by the loops connecting the two β-sheets. Ligand recognition at site 1 is, exclusively, through hydrophobic interactions, whereas binding at site 2 is conferred by polar interactions between a protein-bound calcium and the O2 and O3 of the sugar. The observation, that ligand recognition at site 2 requires only a β-linked sugar that contains equatorial hydroxyls at C2 and C3, explains the broad ligand specificity displayed by vCBM60. The ligand-binding apparatus of vCBM60 displays remarkable structural conservation with a family 36 CBM (CBM36); however, the residues that contribute to carbohydrate recognition are derived from different regions of the two proteins. Three-dimensional structure-based sequence alignments reveal that CBM36 and CBM60 are related by circular permutation. The biological and evolutionary significance of the mechanism of ligand recognition displayed by family 60 CBMs is discussed.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationBinding SitesCalciumCellvibrioCrystallography, X-RayEvolution, MolecularProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein Structure, SecondarySubstrate SpecificityXylosidasesCalciumXylosidases

Identifiers

PMID20659893
PMCPMC2951246
OpenAlexW2043799684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.