Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20659575›Full record

ReviewFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2011

Regulation of secondary metabolism by chromatin structure and epigenetic codes.

Joseph Strauss, Yazmid Reyes-Dominguez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Climate-Driven Regulatory Plasticity Reshapes Mycotoxin Risk and Control in Food Systems.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Comparative Proteomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Growth, Pathogenesis, and Secondary Metabolism ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Epigenetic Regulation of Fungal Secondary Metabolism.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An ascomycete H4 variant with an unknown function.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Light regulation of secondary metabolism in fungi.Journal of biological engineering · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Overview of fungal terpene synthases and their regulation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph StraussFungal Genetics and Genomics Unit, AIT - Austrian Institute of Technology and BOKU-University Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. joseph.strauss@boku.ac.at
Yazmid Reyes-Dominguez
Austrian Institute of Technology · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 19731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin, composed of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histones, is the relevant substrate for all genetic processes in eukaryotic nuclei. Changes in chromatin structure are associated with the activation and silencing of gene transcription and reversible post-translational modifications of histones are now known to direct chromatin structure transitions. Recent studies in several fungal species have identified a chromatin-based regulation of secondary metabolism (SM) gene clusters representing an upper-hierarchical level for the coordinated control of large chromosomal elements. Regulation by chromatin transition processes provides a mechanistic model to explain how different SM clusters located at dispersed genomic regions can be simultaneously silenced during primary metabolism. Activation of SM clusters has been shown to be associated with increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 and, consequently, inhibition of histone de-acetylase activities also leads to increased production of secondary metabolites. New findings suggest that SM clusters are silenced by heterochromatic histone marks and that the "closed" heterochromatic structures are reversed during SM activation. This process is mediated by the conserved activator of SM, LaeA. Despite the increase in knowledge about these processes, much remains to be learned from chromatin-level regulation of SM. For example, which proteins "position" the chromatin restructuring signal onto SM clusters or how exactly LaeA works to mediate the low level of heterochromatic marks inside different clusters remain open questions. Answers to these and other chromatin-related questions would certainly complete our understanding of SM gene regulation and signaling and, because for many predicted SM clusters corresponding products have not been identified so far, anti-silencing strategies would open new ways for the identification of novel bioactive substances.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsGene Expression Regulation, FungalChromatinFungiGenes, FungalGene SilencingMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMultigene FamilyTranscriptional ActivationChromatin

Identifiers

PMID20659575
PMCPMC3935439
OpenAlexW2019803108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.