ArticleDrugs & aging2010
Discontinuation of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment and determinants thereof in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Persistence with anti-dementia medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Improving medication adherence among community-dwelling seniors with cognitive impairment: a systematic review of interventions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of concomitant use of memantine on mortality and efficacy outcomes of galantamine-treated patients with Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2016Trial
- Non-adherence to antidementia medications and associated factors: a study of Spanish population-based registry data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Persistence With Oral Antihyperglycemic Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Dementia in Germany.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Persistence and adherence with dementia pharmacotherapy: relevance of patient, provider, and system factors.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014Review
- Article
- Pharmacist-based Donepezil Outpatient Consultation Service to improve medication persistence.Patient preference and adherence · 2012Article
- Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer's disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2011Article
- The Need for Innovative Methods to Increase Adherence in Individuals Experiencing Cognitive Decline.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) rivastigmine and galantamine have been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in the Netherlands. Differences between ChEIs regarding persistence or the use of effective doses in daily clinical practice have been observed. However, most studies assessing ChEI discontinuation and associated determinants have been conducted in North America and there is a lack of knowledge about ChEI discontinuation and its determinants in daily clinical practice in Europe.
objectivesTo assess ChEI discontinuation in daily practice in the Netherlands and to seek its determinants, including suboptimal utilization.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using data from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System. Included patients were aged > or =50 years at first dispensing of a ChEI, had a first dispensing of a ChEI between 1998 and 2008, had a prior medication history of 12 months and had at least one subsequent dispensing of any kind of medication. The proportion of patients who discontinued ChEIs over 3 years was determined. Cox regression was used to assess determinants for early (< or =6 months) discontinuation and, separately, for late discontinuation during a subsequent 30-month follow-up among those persisting with treatment for >6 months.
resultsAt 6 months, 30.8% of 3369 study patients had discontinued ChEIs, compared with 59.0% after 3 years. Thirty-five percent of patients taking rivastigmine reached the WHO-defined daily dose compared with 80% taking galantamine. At 6 months, compared with regular-dose rivastigmine, low-dose rivastigmine or low-dose galantamine was associated with an increased risk of early discontinuation, whereas regular-dose galantamine was associated with a decreased risk, as was concurrent use of cardiac medications, drugs for Parkinson's disease, propulsives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines. Associations of ChEI type/dose or co-medications with discontinuation among patients persisting for > 6 months differed somewhat from associations with discontinuation before 6 months.
conclusionsFewer patients taking rivastigmine than those taking galantamine reached recommended doses. Furthermore, patients taking rivastigmine had an increased risk of early discontinuation compared with patients taking galantamine. Adverse effects leading to treatment intolerance and suboptimal utilization may have been contributing factors to these observed differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.