Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20658794›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2010

Discontinuation of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment and determinants thereof in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.

Edeltraut Kröger, Rob van Marum, Patrick Souverein, Toine Egberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edeltraut KrögerUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. edeltraut.kroger.cha@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Rob van Marum
Patrick Souverein
Toine Egberts
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) rivastigmine and galantamine have been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in the Netherlands. Differences between ChEIs regarding persistence or the use of effective doses in daily clinical practice have been observed. However, most studies assessing ChEI discontinuation and associated determinants have been conducted in North America and there is a lack of knowledge about ChEI discontinuation and its determinants in daily clinical practice in Europe.

objectivesTo assess ChEI discontinuation in daily practice in the Netherlands and to seek its determinants, including suboptimal utilization.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using data from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System. Included patients were aged > or =50 years at first dispensing of a ChEI, had a first dispensing of a ChEI between 1998 and 2008, had a prior medication history of 12 months and had at least one subsequent dispensing of any kind of medication. The proportion of patients who discontinued ChEIs over 3 years was determined. Cox regression was used to assess determinants for early (< or =6 months) discontinuation and, separately, for late discontinuation during a subsequent 30-month follow-up among those persisting with treatment for >6 months.

resultsAt 6 months, 30.8% of 3369 study patients had discontinued ChEIs, compared with 59.0% after 3 years. Thirty-five percent of patients taking rivastigmine reached the WHO-defined daily dose compared with 80% taking galantamine. At 6 months, compared with regular-dose rivastigmine, low-dose rivastigmine or low-dose galantamine was associated with an increased risk of early discontinuation, whereas regular-dose galantamine was associated with a decreased risk, as was concurrent use of cardiac medications, drugs for Parkinson's disease, propulsives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines. Associations of ChEI type/dose or co-medications with discontinuation among patients persisting for > 6 months differed somewhat from associations with discontinuation before 6 months.

conclusionsFewer patients taking rivastigmine than those taking galantamine reached recommended doses. Furthermore, patients taking rivastigmine had an increased risk of early discontinuation compared with patients taking galantamine. Adverse effects leading to treatment intolerance and suboptimal utilization may have been contributing factors to these observed differences.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGalantamineHumansNetherlandsPhenylcarbamatesRetrospective StudiesRivastigmineCholinesterase InhibitorsGalantaminePhenylcarbamatesRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID20658794
OpenAlexW960146918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.