Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20656094›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Dietetic Association2010

Brief telephone intervention increases soy intake in peri- and postmenopausal US women: the Herbal Alternatives Trial (HALT).

Jeannette M Beasley, Jeannette M Schenk, Evette Ludman, Johanna W Lampe, Susan D Reed, Lou Grothaus, Katherine M Newton

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannette M BeasleyFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, N M3-A410, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. jbeasley@whi.org
Jeannette M Schenk
Evette Ludman
Johanna W Lampe
Susan D Reed
Lou Grothaus
Katherine M Newton
Health Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGroup Health Cooperative · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES FOR MENOPAUSE: A RANDOMIZED TRIALR01AG017057 · NIA · GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE · PI NEWTON, KATHERINE M. · 2000 to 2004
$3.2M
Health Care Improvement for Aging WomenT32AG027677 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017057NIA NIH HHS R01AG17057NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective dietary intervention strategies that can be widely disseminated and have the potential for sustainable dietary modifications are needed. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a telephone-based soy intervention.

designA randomized controlled trial comparing self-reported intake and serum measures of soy during a 1-year dietary soy (Soy) to fruit and vegetable (Placebo) intervention conducted in two of five arms from the Herbal Alternatives Trial between May 2001 and September 2004. SUBJECTS/

settingOne hundred sixty-three peri- and postmenopausal women (mean age=52 years) consuming self-selected diets in the Pacific Northwest, United States.

interventionFive telephone contacts with a registered dietitian during a 12-month intervention with the goal to increase soy food consumption to two servings daily.

main outcome measuresChange from baseline in self-reported soy servings and serum isoflavone (daidzein and genistein) concentrations were estimated using analysis of variance and generalized estimating equations. Proportions of participants achieving the intervention goal were compared using chi(2) tests.

resultsNinety-four percent (n=74) of participants in the Soy arm and 89% (n=75) in the Placebo arm completed the trial, and slightly more than one third (n=27) received five phone contacts. Mean (+/-standard deviation) intakes of soy were similar for the Soy and Placebo arms at baseline (0.6+/-1.0 vs 0.4+/-0.8 servings/day; P>0.05). At 12-month follow-up visit, mean+/-standard deviation servings of soy per day were 1.6+/-1.4 for the Soy intervention compared to 0.5+/-0.9 within the Placebo arm (P<0.001). There were concomitant increases in serum isoflavones at 3 and 6 months from baseline in the Soy arm only, with approximately twofold increases in both daidzein (mean=66.4 nmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.0 to 93.9 [mean 16.9 ng/mL, 95% CI: 9.9 to 23.8]) and genistein (mean=100.4 nmol/L, 95% CI: 60.9 to 139.9 [mean 27.1 ng/mL, 95% CI: 16.5 to 37.8]) concentrations. Mean weight changed by <1 kg during the 12-month period in each group and physical activity remained stable, suggesting that participants incorporated soy foods into their diet by substituting for non soy foods rather than adding them to their diet.

conclusionsA brief telephone-based intervention with a focused message delivered by a registered dietitian is a feasible approach for encouraging targeted dietary changes, such as an increase in soy intake among peri- and postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Soy FoodsTelephoneAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCounselingDieteticsFemaleFruitGenisteinHealth PromotionHumansIsoflavonesMiddle AgedPerimenopausePhytoestrogensPostmenopausedaidzeinGenisteinIsoflavonesPhytoestrogens

Identifiers

PMID20656094
PMCPMC2936816
OpenAlexW2003692315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.