ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Coclustering of ErbB1 and ErbB2 revealed by FRET-sensitized acceptor bleaching.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Action of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Incorporated in Extracellular Vesicles.Cells · 2020Review
- Influenza A viruses use multivalent sialic acid clusters for cell binding and receptor activation.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
- Understanding FRET as a research tool for cellular studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Spatial regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases in development and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical theory states that ligand binding induces the dimerization of ErbB proteins, leading to their activation. Although we and other investigators have shown the existence of preformed homoclusters of ErbB receptors and analyzed their composition, the stoichiometry of their heteroclusters has not been quantitatively described. Here, we report the development of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-sensitized acceptor bleaching (FSAB) technique to quantitate the ratio of ErbB1 and ErbB2 in their heteroclusters. In FSAB, photolabile acceptors within FRET distance from photostable donors are excited and photobleached by FRET, and the fraction of acceptors that are participating in FRET is determined. In quiescent SKBR-3 breast cancer cells, approximately 35% of ErbB1 and approximately 10% of ErbB2 have been found in heteroclusters. Epidermal growth factor (ligand of ErbB1) increased the fraction of ErbB2 heteroclustering with ErbB1, whereas the ratio of heteroclustered ErbB1 did not change significantly. The fractions of heteroclustered ErbB1 and ErbB2 were independent of their expression levels, indicating that the formation of these clusters is not driven by the law of mass action. In contrast, the FRET efficiency depended on the donor/acceptor ratio as expected. We present a model in which preformed receptor clusters are rearranged upon ligand stimulation, and report that the composition of these clusters can be quantitatively described by the FSAB technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.