Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20655467›Full record

ArticleCell2010

Crossover invariance determined by partner choice for meiotic DNA break repair.

Randy W Hyppa, Gerald R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Two auxiliary factors promote Dmc1-driven DNA strand exchange via stepwise mechanisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Intragenic meiotic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is sensitive to environmental temperature changes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Randy W HyppaFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Basic Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Gerald R Smith

Funding

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF HOTSPOTS OF GENETIC RECOMBINATIONR01GM031693 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SMITH, GERALD R · 1985 to 2015
$9.7M
Molecular Analysis of Hotspots of Genetic RecombinationR56GM031693 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SMITH, GERALD R · 2007 to 2007
$586k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM031693NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031693NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM031693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossovers between meiotic homologs are crucial for their proper segregation, and crossover number and position are carefully controlled. Crossover homeostasis in budding yeast maintains crossovers at the expense of noncrossovers when double-strand DNA break (DSB) frequency is reduced. The mechanism of maintaining constant crossover levels in other species has been unknown. Here we investigate in fission yeast a different aspect of crossover control--the near invariance of crossover frequency per kb of DNA despite large variations in DSB intensity across the genome. Crossover invariance involves the choice of sister chromatid versus homolog for DSB repair. At strong DSB hotspots, intersister repair outnumbers interhomolog repair approximately 3:1, but our genetic and physical data indicate the converse in DSB-cold regions. This unanticipated mechanism of crossover control may operate in many species and explain, for example, the large excess of DSBs over crossovers and the repair of DSBs on unpaired chromosomes in diverse species.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticDNA RepairMeiosisDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, CruciformRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsDNA, CruciformRad51 RecombinaseSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSfr1 protein, S pombeSwi5 protein, S pombe

Identifiers

PMID20655467
PMCPMC2911445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.