Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20653804›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2010

A controlled trial of an intervention to improve urinary and fecal incontinence and constipation.

John F Schnelle, Felix W Leung, Satish S C Rao, Linda Beuscher, Emmett Keeler, Jack W Clift, Sandra Simmons

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John F SchnelleDivision of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Center for Quality Aging, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. John.Schnelle@Vanderbilt.edu
Felix W Leung
Satish S C Rao
Linda Beuscher
Emmett Keeler
Jack W Clift
Sandra Simmons
RAND Corporation · USVA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center · USFrederick S. Pardee RAND Graduate School · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA OLDER AMERICANS INDEPENDENCE CENTERP30AG028748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MOORE, ALISON AHERN · 2006 to 2017
$9.8M
Integrating Interventions to Improve Fecal IncontinenceR01AG023555 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNELLE, JOHN F · 2005 to 2008
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS AG028748NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028748NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023555NIA NIH HHS R01 AG23555-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate effects of a multicomponent intervention on fecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI) outcomes.

designRandomized controlled trial.

settingSix nursing homes (NHs).

participantsOne hundred twelve NH residents.

interventionIntervention subjects were offered toileting assistance, exercise, and choice of food and fluid snacks every 2 hours for 8 hours per day over 3 months. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of UI and FI and rate of appropriate toileting as determined by direct checks from research staff. Anorectal assessments were completed on a subset of 29 residents.

resultsThe intervention significantly increased physical activity, frequency of toileting, and food and fluid intake. UI improved (P=.049), as did frequency of bowel movements (P<.001) and percentage of bowel movements (P<.001) in the toilet. The frequency of FI did not change. Eighty-nine percent of subjects who underwent anorectal testing showed a dyssynergic voiding pattern, which could explain the lack of efficacy of this intervention program alone on FI.

conclusionThis multicomponent intervention significantly changed multiple risk factors associated with FI and increased bowel movements without decreasing FI. The dyssynergic voiding pattern and rectal hyposensitivity suggest that future interventions may have to be supplemented with bulking agents (fiber), biofeedback therapy, or both to improve bowel function.

Indexed as

AgedAnal CanalConstipationDefecationDietExerciseFecal IncontinenceFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleManometryNursing HomesRectumTransducers, PressureUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID20653804
PMCPMC2955182
OpenAlexW1900926014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.