Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20652767›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2010

Treating hyperglycemia in neurocritical patients: benefits and perils.

Daniel A Godoy, Mario Di Napoli, Alejandro A Rabinstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03004079 (Assessment of the Clinical Importance of Insulin Resistance & Steroid-Associated Hyperglycemia in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03004079 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Clinical Importance of Insulin Resistance & Steroid-Associated Hyperglycemia in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2016 to 2020Enrolled160ConditionsRelapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically Isolated Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Intravenous insulin protocol reduces time to target glucose in critically ill trauma and burn patients.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Potential link between post-acute ischemic stroke exposure to hypoglycemia and hemorrhagic transformation.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Targeted treatment in severe traumatic brain injury in the age of precision medicine.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2017
    Review
  18. Glucocorticoid-associated blood glucose response and MS relapse recovery.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Cerebral Lactate Metabolism After Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel A GodoyNeurointensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Pasteur, Catamarca, Argentina.
Mario Di Napoli
Alejandro A Rabinstein
Ellis Hospital · USNational University of Catamarca · ARWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing debate over the value of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in critically ill patients. Available trials have been performed in general medical or surgical intensive care units, and the results may not be directly applicable to patients with severe acute brain disease because these patients may have heightened susceptibility to hyperglycemia (HyperG) and hypoglycemia. Our objective was to review the pathophysiology and effects of HyperG and hypoglycemia in neurocritical patients and to analyze the potential role of IIT in this population. Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature combining the terms HyperG, hypoglycemia, insulin, stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury (SCI), and related diagnoses. Brain metabolism is highly dependent on constant supply of glucose. As a consequence, the acutely injured brain is particularly sensitive to hypoglycemia, which can induce a state of energy failure (metabolic crisis). Meanwhile, neurocritical patients have a high prevalence of HyperG, and its occurrence is associated with poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke, ICH, SAH, and TBI. It is unclear whether this association is due to direct detrimental effects exerted by HyperG or simply represents a marker of severe brain injury. Insulin has been shown to have various potentially pleiotropic neuroprotective properties in experimental models. However, the safety and efficacy of IIT in patients with critical brain disease have not been well studied. Available results do not support the use of IIT to maintain strict normoglycemia in this population. Patients with critical brain disease should have frequent glucose monitoring because severe HyperG and even modest hypoglycemia may be detrimental. Careful use of insulin infusion protocols appears advisable, but maintenance of strict normoglycemia cannot be recommended. Rigorous studies must be conducted to assess the value of insulin therapy and to determine the optimal blood glucose targets in patients with the most common acute vascular and traumatic brain insults.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID20652767
OpenAlexW2042455201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.