Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20652724›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Combination of 6-thioguanine, capecitabine, and celecoxib with temozolomide or lomustine for recurrent high-grade glioma.

Tobias Walbert, Mark R Gilbert, Morris D Groves, Vinay K Puduvalli, W K Alfred Yung, Charles A Conrad, George C Bobustuc, Howard Colman, Sigmund H Hsu, B Nebiyou Bekele and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Therapeutic strategies based on polymeric microparticles.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias WalbertDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Unit 0431, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA.
Mark R Gilbert
Morris D Groves
Vinay K Puduvalli
W K Alfred Yung
Charles A Conrad
George C Bobustuc
Howard Colman
Sigmund H Hsu
B Nebiyou Bekele
Wei Qiao
Victor A Levin
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USOrlando Regional Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Patient Oriented Research Program in Neuro-oncologyK24CA160777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PUDUVALLI, VINAY K · 2012 to 2015
$580k
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS K24 CA160777NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ) or lomustine (CCNU) in combination with 6-thioguanine, capecitabine, and celecoxib for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma. Forty-three patients with recurrent glioblastoma and 31 patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) were enrolled in this open-label, non-comparative study. Patients previously treated with TMZ received CCNU while all others received TMZ; all patients received 6-thioguanine, capecitabine, and celecoxib. Endpoints were 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with AG, 6-month PFS for patients with glioblastoma, duration of PFS, and MRI-based objective response rates. Results from the TMZ and CCNU treatment arms were combined in the final analysis because there was no statistically significant difference between them. Thirty-eight patients with glioblastoma were treated with the lomustine-based regimen, and five received the TMZ-based regimen. For the 43 glioblastoma patients, the objective response rate was 12 and 33% had stable disease; the 6-month PFS was 14% and median overall survival 32 weeks. For the 31 AG patients, the combined objective response rate was 26 and 42% had stable disease; the 12 month PFS was 44%. Treatment was reasonably well tolerated with hematological toxicity common and more frequent with CCNU than TMZ. The combination therapy with 6-thioguanine, capecitabine and celecoxib plus CCNU or TMZ does not appear to be more effective than other alkylating agent schedules for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The combination, however, is promising for patients with recurrent high-grade AG.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCapecitabineCelecoxibDacarbazineDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGlioblastomaGliosarcomaHumansLomustineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleCapecitabineCelecoxibDacarbazineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilLomustinePyrazolesSulfonamidesTemozolomideThioguanine

Identifiers

PMID20652724
PMCPMC5557017
OpenAlexW2037607735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.