Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20652559›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2010

Hollow microneedle arrays for intradermal drug delivery and DNA electroporation.

Liévin Daugimont, Nolwenn Baron, Gaëlle Vandermeulen, Natasa Pavselj, Damijan Miklavcic, Marie-Caroline Jullien, Gonzalo Cabodevila, Lluis M Mir, Véronique Préat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hydrogel-forming microarray patch mediated transdermal delivery of tetracycline hydrochloride.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Microneedle systems for delivering nucleic acid drugs.Journal of pharmaceutical investigation · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nucleic acid delivery into skin for the treatment of skin disease: Proofs-of-concept, potential impact, and remaining challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Microneedles: an innovative platform for gene delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Skin electroporation of a plasmid encoding hCAP-18/LL-37 host defense peptide promotes wound healing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Liévin DaugimontLouvain Drug Research Institute, Unité de pharmacie galénique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 73/20, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Nolwenn Baron
Gaëlle Vandermeulen
Natasa Pavselj
Damijan Miklavcic
Marie-Caroline Jullien
Gonzalo Cabodevila
Lluis M Mir
Véronique Préat
UCLouvain · BEFranche-Comté Électronique Mécanique Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies · FRUniversity of Ljubljana · SICentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association of microneedles with electric pulses causing electroporation could result in an efficient and less painful delivery of drugs and DNA into the skin. Hollow conductive microneedles were used for (1) needle-free intradermal injection and (2) electric pulse application in order to achieve electric field in the superficial layers of the skin sufficient for electroporation. Microneedle array was used in combination with a vibratory inserter to disrupt the stratum corneum, thus piercing the skin. Effective injection of proteins into the skin was achieved, resulting in an immune response directed to the model antigen ovalbumin. However, when used both as microneedles to inject and as electrodes to apply the electric pulses, the setup showed several limitations for DNA electrotransfer. This could be due to the distribution of the electric field in the skin as shown by numerical calculations and/or the low dose of DNA injected. Further investigation of these parameters is needed in order to optimize minimally invasive DNA electrotransfer in the skin.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsElectroporationMicroinjectionsSkinAnimalsAntigensDNAGene Transfer TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeedlesOvalbuminAntigensDNAOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID20652559
OpenAlexW2014959070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.