GuidelineDer Internist2010
[Prevention and follow-up care of sepsis. 1st revision of S2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V., DSG) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, DIVI)].
Guideline in Der Internist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enteral nutrition is associated with improved outcome in patients with severe sepsis. A secondary analysis of the VISEP trial.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2013Trial
- Do clinical guidelines improve management of sepsis in critically ill elderly patients? A before-and-after study of the implementation of a sepsis protocol.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2012Trial
- Serum IgG levels and mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock : The SBITS data.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Article
- [Impairment of oxygenation of patients in surgical intensive care : Early symptom of severe sepsis].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- [Fluid resuscitation in hemorrhage].Der Anaesthesist · 2014Review
- Severity of cardiac impairment in the early stage of community-acquired sepsis determines worse prognosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013Observational
- [Surface disinfection in the context of infection prevention in intensive care units].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2013Review
- [Sepsis : putting knowledge into practice].Der Internist · 2013Article
- [Septic shock and septic cardiomyopathy].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 1st revision of the S2k guideline on the prevention and follow-up care of sepsis, provided by the German Sepsis Society in collaboration with 17 German medical scientific societies and one self-help group provides state-of-the-art information on the effective and appropriate medical care of critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The guideline recommendations may not be applied under all circumstances. It rests with the clinician to decide whether a certain recommendation should be adopted or not, taking into consideration the unique set of clinical facts presented in connection with each individual patient as well as the available resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20652527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.