Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20652478›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2010

[Reduced preoperative fasting periods. Current status after a survey of patients and colleagues].

J-P Breuer, G Bosse, L Prochnow, S Seifert, C Langelotz, G Wassilew, H Francois-Kettner, N Polze, C Spies

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Preoperative risk evaluation from the perspective of anaesthesiology].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J-P BreuerKlinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte und Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Deutschland. philipp.breuer@charite.de
G Bosse
L Prochnow
S Seifert
C Langelotz
G Wassilew
H Francois-Kettner
N Polze
C Spies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince October 2004 German Anaesthesiology Societies have officially recommended a decreased fasting period of 2 h for clear fluids and 6 h for solid food before elective surgery. A survey of patients and health care workers was carried out in our university clinic to assess the implementation of the new fasting recommendations.

methodsSurgical patients (n=865) as well as physicians and nurses specialized in anaesthesia and surgery (n=2,355) were invited to complete a written questionnaire. The survey inquired about prescribed and practiced duration of fasting, attitudes towards reduced preoperative fasting and knowledge of the new guidelines.

resultsData from 784 patients (91%) and 557 health care workers (24%) were analysed. Patients reported mean fasting times of 10+/-5 h for fluids and 15+/-4 h for solid food. Of the patients 52% and 16% would have preferred to drink and eat before surgery, respectively and 10% were informed about the new recommendations of shorter preoperative fluid and solid fasting. Such patients reported significantly reduced fasting times for fluids compared with those who were recommended to fast for the traditional longer periods (8+/-6 versus 12+/-4 h, p<0.001). Preoperative fasting advice remembered by the patients significantly differed from the prescribed recommendations (2 h fluid fasting, 22 versus 53%, p<0.001). Anaesthesiologists were significantly more knowledgeable of the new guidelines (90 versus 32-42%, p<0.001) and significantly more willing to recommend the new short preoperative fasting times (75 versus 15-19%, p<0.001) than other health care workers. Of all health care workers 82% and 32% reported patients' frequent desire to drink and eat before surgery, respectively, 92% considered reduced preoperative fasting to be positive, 76% feared increased risks for patients and 42% expected a decreased flexibility in their daily work.

conclusionThe current guidelines for preoperative fasting have not been widely implemented. Besides a knowledge discrepancy, remarkable concerns remain regarding higher risk for patients which may be important barriers to implementation. Nevertheless, health care workers are aware of patients' desire for shorter preoperative fasting. If the new guidelines are recommended patients will make use of them. Further training of staff and adequate implementation tools are needed.

Indexed as

FastingPreoperative CareAnesthesiaAttitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionFoodGermanyGuidelines as TopicHumansPatientsRespiratory AspirationRisk Assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.