ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2010
Changing paradigm of the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults: novel drugs and catheter ablation techniques show promise? Systematic review on pharmacotherapy and interventional strategies.BioMed research international · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Imatinib-based therapy in adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- IKK-dependent activation of NF-κB contributes to myeloid and lymphoid leukemogenesis by BCR-ABL1.Blood · 2014Article
- Prognostic factors influencing clinical outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following imatinib-based therapy in BCR-ABL-positive ALL.Blood cancer journal · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the pre-imatinib era, the treatment outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) was dismal. Complete remission was generally achieved only in about 50% to 60% of patients, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), when feasible in younger patients, was virtually the sole curative modality. Imatinib has changed the situation dramatically, however, in combination with conventional chemotherapy or with corticosteroid alone, producing about 95% complete remission and thus increasing the number of patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Currently, the overall survival of patients who have undergone allo-HSCT exceeds 50%, and a considerable proportion of patients for whom allo-HSCT is not feasible are predictably curable. The next question is how to prevent relapse, which is observed not only in more than half of patients for whom allo-HSCT is not feasible but also in a considerable number of patients after allo-HSCT. Thus, improvement of postremission therapy is crucial. Whether intensive chemotherapy with currently available cytotoxic drugs contributes to the prevention of relapse is questionable, because intensive chemotherapy alone in the pre-imatinib era nearly always failed to cure this disease. Promising partners to be combined with imatinib or with a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) will be corticosteroids and vincristine. New TKIs such as dasatinib should be incorporated into the early phase of postremission therapy. Recognizing the small number of patients with Ph(+) ALL, intergroup or international studies are necessary to develop the best postremission therapy. In the near future, it is hoped that Ph(+) ALL will become one of the leukemias for which allo-HSCT is offered only for relapsed or extremely high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20652453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.