ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2011
The effects of various spatial distributions of weak noise on rhythmic spiking.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse stochastic resonance in networks of spiking neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Reliability of signal transmission in stochastic nerve axon equations.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2016Article
- Bursting regimes in a reaction-diffusion system with action potential-dependent equilibrium.PloS one · 2015Article
- Input-output relation and energy efficiency in the neuron with different spike threshold dynamics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015Article
- Inhibition of rhythmic spiking by colored noise in neural systems.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2011Article
- The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We consider the response of the classical Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) spatial system in the weak to intermediate noise regime near the bifurcation to repetitive spiking. The deterministic component of the input (signal) is restricted to a small segment near the origin whereas noise, with parameter σ, occurs either only in the signal region or throughout the whole neuron. In both cases small noise inhibits the spiking and there is a minimum in the spike counts at σ ≈ 0.15. At the same value of σ, the variance of the spike counts undergoes a pronounced maximum. For spatially restricted noise, the spike count continues to increase beyond the minimum until σ=0.5, but in the case of spatially extended noise the spike count begins to decline around σ=0.35 to give a local maximum. For both spatial distributions of noise, the variance of the spike count is found to also have a local minimum at about σ=0.4. Examples are given of the probability distributions of the spike counts and the spatial distributions of spikes with varying noise level. The differences in behaviours of the spike counts as noise increases beyond 0.3 are attributable to noise-induced spiking outside the signal region, which has a larger probability of occurrence when the noise is over an extended region. This aspect is investigated by ascertaining the probability of noise-induced spiking as a function of noise level and examination of the corresponding latency distributions. These findings prompt a definition of weak noise in the standard HH model as that for which the probability of secondary phenomena is negligible, which occurs when σ is less than about 0.3. Finally, if signal and weak (σ<0.3) noise are applied on disjoint intervals, then the noise has no effect on the instigation or propagation of spikes, no matter how large its region of application. These results are expected to apply to type 2 neurons in general, including the majority of cortical pyramidal cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20652386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.