ArticlePLoS biology2010
Cryptic variation between species and the basis of hybrid performance.
Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spliceosome buffers cryptic genetic variation to enforce phenotypic robustness inScience advances · 2026Article
- Phenotypic complexity determines the predictability of molecular convergence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Formalizing the law of diminishing returns in metabolic networks using an electrical analogy.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Fisher's Geometric Model as a Tool to Study Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Hybridization may aid evolutionary rescue of an endangered East African passerine.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Heterosis counteracts hybrid breakdown to forestall speciation by parallel natural selection.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- System drift and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Evolution of flower allometry and pigmentation in Mammillaria haageana (Cactaceae).BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Understanding the classics: the unifying concepts of transgressive segregation, inbreeding depression and heterosis and their central relevance for crop breeding.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- The geometry and genetics of hybridization.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2020Article
- Coadapted genomes and selection on hybrids: Fisher's geometric model explains a variety of empirical patterns.Evolution letters · 2018Article
- Transcriptomic comparison of invasive bigheaded carps (Ecology and evolution · 2016Article
- Article
- Transcriptional Derepression Uncovers Cryptic Higher-Order Genetic Interactions.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Molecular and ecological signs of mitochondrial adaptation: consequences for introgression?Heredity · 2014Article
- Variation in Arabidopsis flowering time associated with cis-regulatory variation in CONSTANS.Nature communications · 2014Article
- Hybrid fitness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: lessons learned from Louisiana Irises.Heredity · 2012Review
- The developmental trajectory of leaflet morphology in wild tomato species.Plant physiology · 2012Article
- Role of pleiotropy in the evolution of a cryptic developmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans.PLoS biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crosses between closely related species give two contrasting results. One result is that species hybrids may be inferior to their parents, for example, being less fertile [1]. The other is that F1 hybrids may display superior performance (heterosis), for example with increased vigour [2]. Although various hypotheses have been proposed to account for these two aspects of hybridisation, their biological basis is still poorly understood [3]. To gain further insights into this issue, we analysed the role that variation in gene expression may play. We took a conserved trait, flower asymmetry in Antirrhinum, and determined the extent to which the underlying regulatory genes varied in expression among closely related species. We show that expression of both genes analysed, CYC and RAD, varies significantly between species because of cis-acting differences. By making a quantitative genotype-phenotype map, using a range of mutant alleles, we demonstrate that the species lie on a plateau in gene expression-morphology space, so that the variation has no detectable phenotypic effect. However, phenotypic differences can be revealed by shifting genotypes off the plateau through genetic crosses. Our results can be readily explained if genomes are free to evolve within an effectively neutral zone in gene expression space. The consequences of this drift will be negligible for individual loci, but when multiple loci across the genome are considered, we show that the variation may have significant effects on phenotype and fitness, causing a significant drift load. By considering these consequences for various gene-expression-fitness landscapes, we conclude that F1 hybrids might be expected to show increased performance with regard to conserved traits, such as basic physiology, but reduced performance with regard to others. Thus, our study provides a new way of explaining how various aspects of hybrid performance may arise through natural variation in gene activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.