Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2065189›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1991

Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells. II. Mechanical energies to separate large contact areas.

E Evans, D Berk, A Leung, N Mohandas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-Throughput Universal DNA Curtain Arrays for Single-Molecule Fluorescence Imaging.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular analysis of antigen-independent adhesion forces between T and B lymphocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E EvansDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
D Berk
A Leung
N Mohandas
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

RHEOLOGICAL AND ADHERENCE PROPERTIES OF SICKLE CELLSR01HL031579 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI NARLA, MOHANDAS · 1985 to 2010
$3.8M
BLOOD CELL MECHANICS, SURFACE AFFINITY AND ADHESIONR01HL045099 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI EVANS, EVAN A · 1990 to 1992
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL31579NHLBI NIH HHS HL45099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As detailed in a companion paper (Berk, D., and E. Evans. 1991. Biophys. J. 59:861-872), a method was developed to quantitate the strength of adhesion between agglutinin-bonded membranes without ambiguity due to mechanical compliance of the cell body. The experimental method and analysis were formulated around controlled assembly and detachment of a pair of macroscopically smooth red blood cell surfaces. The approach provides precise measurement of the membrane tension applied at the perimeter of an adhesive contact and the contact angle theta c between membrane surfaces which defines the mechanical leverage factor (1-cos theta c) important in the definition of the work to separate a unit area of contact. Here, the method was applied to adhesion and detachment of red cells bound together by different monoclonal antibodies to red cell membrane glycophorin and the snail-helix pomatia-lectin. For these tests, one of the two red cells was chemically prefixed in the form of a smooth sphere then equilibrated with the agglutinin before the adhesion-detachment procedure. The other cell was not exposed to the agglutinin until it was forced into contact with the rigid cell surface by mechanical impingement. Large regions of agglutinin bonding were produced by impingement but no spontaneous spreading was observed beyond the forced contact. Measurements of suction force to detach the deformable cell yielded consistent behavior for all of the agglutinins: i.e., the strength of adhesion increased progressively with reduction in contact diameter throughout detachment. This tension-contact diameter behavior was not altered over a ten-fold range of separation rates. In special cases, contacts separated smoothly after critical tensions were reached; these were the highest values attained for tension. Based on measurements reported in another paper (Evans et al. 1991. Biophys. J. 59:838-848) of the forces required to rupture molecular-point attachments, the density of cross-bridges was estimated with the assumption that the tension was proportional to the discrete rupture force x the number of attachments per unit length. These estimates showed that only a small fraction of agglutinin formed cross-bridges at initial assembly and increased progressively with separation. When critical tension levels were reached, it appeared that nearly all local agglutinin was involved as cross-bridges. Because one cell surface was chemically fixed, receptor accumulation was unlikely; thus, microscopic "roughness" and steric repulsion probably modulated formation of cross-bridges on initial contact. To counter the steric repulsion, adhesive contacts were exposed to solutions of a high molecular weight polymer to draw the surfaces together by osmotic dehydration of the adhesion gap. These stresses exceeded initial mechanical assembly stresses by up to three orders of magnitude. As expected, the strength of adhesion was greatly enhanced by the added impingement stress.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionHemagglutininsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalErythrocyte MembraneErythrocytesHelix, SnailsHemagglutinationHumansImmune SeraKineticsLectinsMathematicsAntibodies, MonoclonalHelix lectinHemagglutininsImmune SeraLectins

Identifiers

PMID2065189
PMCPMC1281250
OpenAlexW2130624498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.