Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20651030›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2010

A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Emily B Kramer, Haritha Vallabhaneni, Lauren M Mayer, Philip J Farabaugh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Translation fidelity mechanisms and their changes in aging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. RNAViruses · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of a core ribosomal innovation in octopus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily B KramerProgram in Molecular and Cell Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA.
Haritha Vallabhaneni
Lauren M Mayer
Philip J Farabaugh
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

The genetics of ribosomal reading frame maintenanceR01GM029480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI FARABAUGH, PHILIP JAMES · 1985 to 2010
$2.7M
Molecular genetics of translational accuracyR56GM029480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI FARABAUGH, PHILIP JAMES · 2007 to 2007
$323k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM029480NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029480NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM029480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of protein synthesis must be sufficiently rapid and sufficiently accurate to support continued cellular growth. Failure in speed or accuracy can have dire consequences, including disease in humans. Most estimates of the accuracy come from studies of bacterial systems, principally Escherichia coli, and have involved incomplete analysis of possible errors. We recently used a highly quantitative system to measure the frequency of all types of misreading errors by a single tRNA in E. coli. That study found a wide variation in error frequencies among codons; a major factor causing that variation is competition between the correct (cognate) and incorrect (near-cognate) aminoacyl-tRNAs for the mutant codon. Here we extend that analysis to measure the frequency of missense errors by two tRNAs in a eukaryote, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The data show that in yeast errors vary by codon from a low of 4 x 10(-5) to a high of 6.9 x 10(-4) per codon and that error frequency is in general about threefold lower than in E. coli, which may suggest that yeast has additional mechanisms that reduce missense errors. Error rate again is strongly influenced by tRNA competition. Surprisingly, missense errors involving wobble position mispairing were much less frequent in S. cerevisiae than in E. coli. Furthermore, the error-inducing aminoglycoside antibiotic, paromomycin, which stimulates errors on all error-prone codons in E. coli, has a more codon-specific effect in yeast.

Indexed as

CodonMutation, MissenseProtein BiosynthesisEscherichia coliParomomycinRNA, Transfer, ArgRNA, Transfer, LysSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCodonParomomycinRNA, Transfer, ArgRNA, Transfer, Lys

Identifiers

PMID20651030
PMCPMC2924539
OpenAlexW2159637373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.