Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20650284›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2011

Cysteine accessibility analysis of the human alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand-binding domain identifies L119 as a gatekeeper.

Roger L Papke, Clare Stokes, Dustin K Williams, Jingyi Wang, Nicole A Horenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Differential Activation and Desensitization States Promoted by NoncanonicalThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heteromeric Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors with MutantThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  8. Allosteric Agonism ofMolecular pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  9. Macroscopic and Microscopic Activation ofMolecular pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roger L PapkeDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. rlpapke@ufl.edu
Clare Stokes
Dustin K Williams
Jingyi Wang
Nicole A Horenstein
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Targeting of Alpha7 nAChR for therapeutic effectsR01GM057481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PAPKE, ROGER L · 2000 to 2023
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of structurally diverse ligands have been produced to selectively target α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). We applied the method of scanning cysteine accessibility mutations (SCAM) to the ligand-binding domain of the α7 nAChR to identify subdomains of particular importance to the binding and subsequent activation by select agonists. We evaluated the activity of four structurally distinct α7 agonists on wild-type human α7 and 44 targeted mutants expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Responses were measured prior and subsequent to the application of the sulfhydryl reagent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA). One mutant (C116S) served as a Cys-null control, and the additional mutants were made in the C116S background. In many cases, the insertion of free cysteines into the agonist-binding site had a negative effect on function, with 12 of 44 mutants showing no detectable responses to ACh, and with only 19 of the 44 mutants showing sufficiently large responses to permit further study. Several of the cysteine mutations, including W55C, showed selectively reduced responses to the largest agonist tested, 2-methoxy,4-hydroxy-benzylidene anabaseine. Interestingly, although homology models suggest that most of the introduced cysteine mutations should have had good solvent accessibility, application of MTSEA had no effect or produced only modest changes in the agonist response profile of most mutants. Consistent with previous studies implicating W55 to play important roles in agonist activation, MTSEA treatment further decreased the functional responses of W55C to all the test agonists. While the cysteine mutation at L119 itself had relatively little effect on receptor function, treatment of L119C receptors with MTSEA or alternative cationic sulfhydryl reagents profoundly decreased activation by all agonists tested, suggesting a general block of gating. The homologous mutation in heteromeric nAChRs produced similar results, provided that the mutation was placed in the beta subunit complementary surface of the ligand-binding domain. Structural models locate the L119 residue directly across the subunit interface from the C-loop of the primary face of the binding domain. Our data suggest that a covalent modification of L119C by MTSEA or other cationic reagents might block the binding of even small agonists such as TMA through electrostatic interactions. Reaction of L119C with small non-polar reagents increases activation by small agonists but can block the access of large ligands such as benzylidene anabaseines to the ligand-binding domain.

Indexed as

alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsBinding SitesCysteineElectrophysiologyHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, NicotinicSignal TransductionXenopus laevisalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorChrna7 protein, humanCysteineReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID20650284
PMCPMC2981631
OpenAlexW2168228363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.