ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2010
Development of a clinical information tool for the electronic medical record: a case study.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution-revolution-devolution: a short history of the provision of knowledge-based information services to Manitoba's health professionals.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021Article
- Library involvement in health informatics education for health professions students and practitioners: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- Electronic health record: integrating evidence-based information at the point of clinical decision making.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014Article
- Impact and user satisfaction of a clinical information portal embedded in an electronic health record.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2011Article
- Introduction: The Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries symposium: "Electronic Health Records and Knowledge-based Information: State-of-the-art and Roles for Libraries in Health Information Technology".Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
questionWhat is the process of developing a clinical information tool to be embedded in the electronic health record of a very large and diverse academic medical center?
settingThe development took place at the University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences Library System.
methodThe clinical information tool developed is a search box with subject tabs to provide quick access to designated full-text information resources. Each subject tab offers a federated search of a different pool of resources. Search results are organized "on the fly" into meaningful categories using clustering technology and are directly accessible from the results page.
resultsAfter more than a year of discussion and planning, a clinical information tool was embedded in the academic medical center's electronic health record.
conclusionThe library successfully developed a clinical information tool, called Clinical-e, for use at the point of care. Future development will refine the tool and evaluate its impact and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.