Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20648040›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2010

Cerebral blood flow modeling in primate cortex.

Romain Guibert, Caroline Fonta, Franck Plouraboué

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomicrofluidics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patterns of Cortical Visual Field Defects From Embolic Stroke Explained by the Anastomotic Organization of Vascular Microlobules.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. fMRI at High Spatial Resolution: Implications for BOLD-Models.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Romain GuibertInstitut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, INPT, UPS, IMFT, Allée Camille Soula, Toulouse, France.
Caroline Fonta
Franck Plouraboué

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report new results on blood flow modeling over large volumes of cortical gray matter of primate brain. We propose a network method for computing the blood flow, which handles realistic boundary conditions, complex vessel shapes, and complex nonlinear blood rheology. From a detailed comparison of the available models for the blood flow rheology and the phase separation effect, we are able to derive important new results on the impact of network structure on blood pressure, hematocrit, and flow distributions. Our findings show that the network geometry (vessel shapes and diameters), the boundary conditions associated with the arterial inputs and venous outputs, and the effective viscosity of the blood are essential components in the flow distribution. In contrast, we show that the phase separation effect has a minor function in the global microvascular hemodynamic behavior. The behavior of the pressure, hematocrit, and blood flow distributions within the network are described through the depth of the primate cerebral cortex and are discussed.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationModels, NeurologicalPrimatesAnimalsArteriesBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureBlood VesselsBlood ViscosityCerebral CortexHematocritHemodynamicsHemorheologyMicrocirculationMicrovesselsVeins

Identifiers

PMID20648040
PMCPMC3023927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.