SynthesisJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2010
Factors affecting the apparent efficacy and safety of tissue plasminogen activator in thrombotic occlusion models of stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use quercetin for pulmonary fibrosis: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Hepatoprotection of Probiotics Against Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseFrontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist in Animal Models of Stroke: an Update.Translational stroke research · 2016Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells in Animal Models of Ischemic Stroke.Stroke · 2016Pooled it
- Testing flow diversion in animal models: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2016Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Trastuzumab in Animal Models of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells on locomotor recovery in animal models of traumatic brain injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2015Pooled it
- Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes.Environmental health perspectives · 2014Pooled it
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014Pooled it
- The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies.ILAR journal · 2014Pooled it
- Meta-analyses of animal studies: an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare.ILAR journal · 2014Pooled it
- Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis.PLoS biology · 2014Pooled it
- Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.Environmental health perspectives · 2013Pooled it
- Systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of the efficacy of RhoA and Rho kinase inhibitors in animal models of ischaemic stroke.Systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Method parameters' impact on mortality and variability in rat stroke experiments: a meta-analysis.BMC neuroscience · 2013Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of temozolomide in animal models of glioma: was clinical efficacy predicted?British journal of cancer · 2013Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies of early decompression in acute spinal cord injury: a battle of time and pressure.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) improves outcome in animal models of stroke and in clinical trial, but is associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. Here, we explore the impact of biologic and experimental design factors on efficacy and bleeding. We conducted a systematic review of studies describing the effect of tPA in thrombotic occlusion models of ischemic stroke followed by random effects meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trim and fill. We identified 202, 66, 128, and 54 comparisons reporting infarct volume, neurobehavioral score, hemorrhage, and mortality, respectively. The rtPA reduced infarct volume by 25.2% (95% confidence interval=21.8 to 28.6, 3388 animals), improved neurobehavioral score by 18.0% (12.6% to 23.3%, n=1243), increased the risk of hemorrhage (odds ratio=1.71, 1.42 to 2.07, n=2833) and had no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio=0.82, 0.62 to 1.08, n=1274). There was an absolute reduction in efficacy of 1.1% (0.7% to 1.4%) for every 10 minutes delay to treatment. Cumulative meta-analysis showed that the estimate of efficacy fell as more data became available. Publication bias inflated efficacy by 5.1% (infarct volume) and 8.1% (neurobehavioral score). This data set was large enough to be adequately powered to estimate with precision the impact of biologic and experimental factors on the efficacy and safety of rtPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.