Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20647408›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Melanocytic nevi, nevus genes, and melanoma risk in a large case-control study in the United Kingdom.

Julia A Newton-Bishop, Yu-Mei Chang, Mark M Iles, John C Taylor, Bert Bakker, May Chan, Susan Leake, Birute Karpavicius, Sue Haynes, Elaine Fitzgibbon and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia A Newton-BishopSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, United Kingdom. j.a.newton-bishop@leeds.ac.uk
Yu-Mei Chang
Mark M Iles
John C Taylor
Bert Bakker
May Chan
Susan Leake
Birute Karpavicius
Sue Haynes
Elaine Fitzgibbon
Faye Elliott
Peter A Kanetsky
Mark Harland
Jennifer H Barrett
D Timothy Bishop
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Leeds · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Genetic Epidermiology of MelanomaR01CA083115 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BISHOP, DAVID TIMOTHY, ELDER, DAVID ERIC · 2001 to 2017
$13.0M
Cancer Research UK 10589Cancer Research UK A10589Cancer Research UK A4994Cancer Research UK A6129Cancer Research UK C588/A4994Cancer Research UK C8216/A6129NCI NIH HHS R01 CA083115NCI NIH HHS R01 CA83115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased number of melanocytic nevi is a potent melanoma risk factor. We have carried out a large population-based case-control study to explore the environmental and genetic determinants of nevi and the relationship with melanoma risk.

methodsWe report nevus phenotype in relation to differing patterns of sun exposure, inherited variation at loci shown in recent genome-wide association studies to be nevus genes, and risk.

resultsIncreased numbers of nevi were associated with holiday sun exposure, particularly on intermittently sun-exposed body sites (test for P(trend) < 0.0001). Large nevi were also associated with holiday sun exposure (P = 0.002). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on chromosomes 9 and 22 were associated with increased numbers of nevi (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002 respectively) and larger nevi (P = 0.03 and P = 0.002), whereas that on chromosome 6 was associated only with large nevi (P = 0.01). Melanoma risk was associated with increased nevus count, large nevi, and atypical nevi for tumors in all body sites (including rare sites) irrespective of age. The risk persisted when adjusted for inheritance of nevus SNPs.

conclusionsThe at-risk nevus phenotype is associated with behaviors known to increase melanoma risk (holiday sun exposure). Although SNPs on chromosomes 6, 9, and 22 were shown to be nevus genes, they explained only a small proportion of melanoma risk and nevus phenotype; therefore, several nevus genes likely remain to be identified. IMPACT: This article confirms the importance of nevi in melanoma pathogenesis and increases understanding of their genetic determinants.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesEnvironmental ExposureHumansMelanomaMiddle AgedNevusPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20647408
PMCPMC2923062
OpenAlexW2106699470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.