Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20647265›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2010

Approaching objects cause confusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease regarding their direction of self-movement.

Mark Mapstone, Charles J Duffy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  8. At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark MapstoneDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Centre, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642-0673, USA.
Charles J Duffy
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

VISUAL MOTION PROCESSING DURING OBSERVER MOVEMENTR01EY010287 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DUFFY, CHARLES J · 1994 to 2009
$3.6M
PERCEPTUAL MECHANISMS OF VISUOSPATIAL ORIENTATIONR01AG017596 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DUFFY, CHARLES J · 2000 to 2010
$3.2M
Attention and Memory Influences on Navigation in Alzheimer's DiseaseK23AG020647 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAPSTONE, MARK · 2003 to 2007
$565k
NEI NIH HHS EY10287NIA NIH HHS AG17596NIA NIH HHS AG20647NIA NIH HHS K23 AG020647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigation requires real-time heading estimation based-on self-movement cues from optic flow and object motion. We presented a simulated heading discrimination task to young, middle-aged and older adult, normal, control subjects and to patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Age-related decline and neurodegenerative disease effects were evident on a battery of neuropsychological and visual motion psychophysical measures. All subject groups made more accurate heading judgements when using optic flow patterns than when using simulated movement past earth-fixed objects. When both optic flow and congruent object were presented together, heading judgements showed intermediate accuracy. In separate trials, we combined optic flow with non-congruent object motion, simulating an independently moving object. In the case of non-congruent objects, almost all of our subjects shifted their perceived self-movement to heading in the direction of the moving object. However, patients with Alzheimer's disease uniquely indicated that perceived self-movement was straight-ahead, in the direction of visual fixation. The tendency to be confused by objects that appear to move independently in the simulated visual scene corresponded to the difficulty patients with Alzheimer's disease encountered in real-world navigation through the hospital lobby (R(2) = 0.87). This was not the case in older normal controls (R(2) = 0.09). We conclude that perceptual factors limit safe, autonomous navigation in early Alzheimer's disease. In particular, the presence of independently moving objects in naturalistic environments limits the capacity of patients with Alzheimer's disease to judge their heading of self-movement.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersConfusionCuesFemaleHead MovementsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionMovementMultivariate AnalysisNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID20647265
PMCPMC2948814
OpenAlexW2026014381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.