Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20646320›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2010

An open cohort study of bone metastasis incidence following surgery in breast cancer patients.

Mitsuru Koizumi, Masataka Yoshimoto, Fujio Kasumi, Takuji Iwase

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Metastasis and its Related Factors in Female Breast Cancer Patients in Kerman, IranAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  11. Detection of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mitsuru KoizumiDiagnostic Imaging Group, Molecular Imaging Center, National Institutes of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555 Japan. mitsuru@nirs.go.jp
Masataka Yoshimoto
Fujio Kasumi
Takuji Iwase
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo help design clinical trials of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy for breast cancer, the temporal incidence of bone metastasis was investigated in a cohort of patients. We have tried to draw the criteria to use adjuvant bisphosphonate.

methodsConsecutive breast cancer patients undergoing surgery between 1988 and 1998 (5459 patients) were followed up regarding bone metastasis until December 2006. Patients' characteristics at the time of surgery were analyzed by Cox's method, with bone metastasis as events. Patient groups were assigned according to Cox's analysis, and were judged either to require the adjuvant bisphosphonate or not, using the tentative criteria: high risk (>3% person-year), medium risk (1-3%), and low risk (<1%).

resultsBone metastasis incidence was constant between 1.0 and 2.8% per person-year more than 10 years. Non-invasive cancer was associated with a very low incidence of bone metastasis (1/436). Multivariate Cox's analysis indicated important factors for bone metastasis were tumor grade (T), nodal grade (pN), and histology. Because T and pN were important factors for bone metastasis prediction, subgroups were made by pTNM stage. Patients at stages IIIA, IIIB and IV had an incidence of >3% per person-year, patients with stage I <1% per person-year, and those with stages II were between 1 and 3%. Further analysis with histology in stage II patients showed that stage IIB with high risk histology also had a high incidence (3% person year), whereas stage IIA with medium risk histology were <1%.

conclusionsBone metastasis incidence remained constant for many years. Using pN, T, and histopathology, patients could be classified into high, medium, and low risk groups.

Indexed as

MastectomyAdultAgedBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, PapillaryCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID20646320
PMCPMC2919501
OpenAlexW1982995506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.