ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2010
Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trainee Autonomy and Supervision in the Inpatient Clinical Learning Environment.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Segregation by Payer in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Ambulatory Care Sites.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Separate But Not Equal? A Cross-Sectional Study of Segregation by Payor Mix in Academic Primary Care Clinics.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Factors Associated With Variation in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Care Delivery.ACR open rheumatology · 2021Article
- Defining the Resident Continuity Clinic Panel Along Patient Outcomes: a Health Equity Opportunity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Disparities in Quality of Primary Care by Resident and Staff Physicians: Is There a Conflict Between Training and Equity?Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Quality of Outpatient Care With Internal Medicine Residents vs Attending Physicians in Veterans Affairs Primary Care Clinics.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Article
- Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2017Review
- Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2017Article
- Pediatric hospitalist perceptions regarding trainees' effects on cost and quality of care.Hospital pediatrics · 2015Article
- Test ordering for preventive health care among family medicine residents.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015Article
- Adherence to prescription opioid monitoring guidelines among residents and attending physicians in the primary care setting.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2015Article
- Racial comparisons of diabetes care and intermediate outcomes in a patient-centered medical home.Diabetes care · 2014Article
- Comparison of neonatal outcomes and intrapartum events in full term vaginal deliveries conducted by staff versus resident physicians.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew population-based data are available on the quality of outpatient care provided by resident physicians in the US.
objectiveTo assess the quality of outpatient care delivered by resident and staff physicians.
designCross-sectional analysis. We used chi-square tests to compare resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators. Using multivariable logistic regression, we controlled for sex, age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and metropolitan status.
participants33,900 hospital-based outpatient visits from the 1997-2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). MEASUREMENTS: Resident and staff physician performance on 19 quality indicators.
resultsResident physicians were more likely to care for younger, non-white, female, urban, and Medicaid-insured patients. In both adjusted and unadjusted analyses, residents outperformed staff on four of 19 measures including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use for congestive heart failure (57.0% vs. 27.6%; p=<0.001), diuretic use for hypertension (57.8% vs. 44.0%; p=<0.001), statin use for hyperlipidemia (56.3% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001), and routine blood pressure screening (85.3% vs. 79.6%; p=0.02). Residents and staff performed at similar levels for counseling (range 15.7 to 32.0%). Residents and staff performed similarly well on measures capturing inappropriate prescribing or overuse of diagnostic testing (range 48.6 to 100%). Residents and staff performed similarly on measures of appropriate prescribing (range from 30.9% to 69.2%).
conclusionsPrimary care provided by resident physicians is of similar or higher quality than that provided by staff physicians. Significant opportunity remains to improve quality of outpatient care provided by all physicians. Residency training programs should devote attention to improving outpatient quality of care delivered by residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.