ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2010
Association of a p73 exon 2 GC/AT polymorphism with colorectal cancer risk and survival in Tunisian patients.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association betweenThe Journal of international medical research · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Impact of p73 gene polymorphism on cancer susceptibility: a meta analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014Pooled it
- Combined analysis of the association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms and cancer risk.Molecular biology reports · 2012Pooled it
- A Review of Cancer Genetics and Genomics Studies in Africa.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Role of p73 Dinucleotide Polymorphism in Prostate Cancer and p73 Protein Isoform Balance.Prostate cancer · 2014Article
- p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms are positively correlated with triple-negative breast cancer in southwestern China.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the association of one linked GC/AT polymorphism at p73 with the risk of colorectal cancer. In the present study, we investigated whether this polymorphism was related to the risk of colorectal cancer, and whether there were relationships between the polymorphism and LOH, protein expression or clinicopathological variables. The p73 genotypes were determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in 150 Tunisians patients with colorectal cancer and in 204 healthy control subjects. Immunohistochemistry was performed on normal mucosa, primary tumour and metastasis. The frequencies of the genotypes were 52% for wild-type (GC/GC), 31% for heterozygotes (GC/AT) and 17% for variants (AT/AT) in patients, and 54%, 35% and 11% in controls, respectively. There were no significant differences of the frequencies of the three genotypes between the patients and controls (p = 0.11). We did not find any relationship of the genotypes with clinicopathological features of patients. We found that patients with the AT/AT genotype had a significantly worse clinical outcome than those with the GC/AT and GC/GC genotype. There were no significant differences between tumoural immunostaining of the total p73 and p73 polymorphism (p = 0.16). However, we found a significant difference between the expression profile of DeltaNp73 isoform and frequencies of the three genotypes (p = 0.0001). No LOH was observed at p73 locus. Our results suggest that the AT/AT genotype is significantly associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. All these findings suggest that p73 polymorphism analysis may provide useful prognostic information for colorectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.