Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20644498›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2010

Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men.

Shua J Chai, Bulbulgul Aumakhan, Mathilda Barnes, Mary Jett-Goheen, Nicole Quinn, Patricia Agreda, Pamela Whittle, Terry Hogan, Wiley D Jenkins, Cornelis A Rietmeijer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03021005 (Provision of HIV Self-Test Kit to Increase Uptake of HIV Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Decline Emergency Department-Based HIV Screening.), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03021005 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Provision of HIV Self-Test Kit to Increase Uptake of HIV Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Decline Emergency Department-Based HIV Screening.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsHIV Self-testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving Access to Care Through Youth-Focused Virtual Sexual Health Navigation.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shua J ChaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Bulbulgul Aumakhan
Mathilda Barnes
Mary Jett-Goheen
Nicole Quinn
Patricia Agreda
Pamela Whittle
Terry Hogan
Wiley D Jenkins
Cornelis A Rietmeijer
Charlotte A Gaydos

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe, Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958NIBIB NIH HHS U54-EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity.

methodsThe website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression.

resultsOf 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again.

conclusionsMen who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.

Indexed as

InternetPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGonorrheaHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningNeisseria gonorrhoeaePrevalenceReagent Kits, DiagnosticResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsSexually Transmitted DiseasesReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID20644498
PMCPMC3187615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.