The challenge to build research capacity in family medicine: is our discipline ready?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Descriptive Bibliometric Study of CERA Publication Dissemination, Authorship, and Citation Rates.Family medicine · 2025
   Article
2. Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks.BMC family practice · 2014
   Article
3. Research development stories from 7 departments of family medicine: 7 lessons for all departments.Annals of family medicine
   Article
4. Implications of demographic shifts for the future of family medicine education.Family medicine
   Article
5. Could 5R research help achieve the triple aim?Annals of family medicine
   Article
6. Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Bridging the Gaps between Communities, Funders, and Policymakers.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as