Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20643836›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2010

Seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns for health care personnel: systematic review.

Po-Po Lam, Larry W Chambers, Donna M Pierrynowski MacDougall, Anne E McCarthy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01207518 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cluster RCT Evaluating the Effectiveness of "Successful Influenza Immunization Campaigns in Healthcare Organizations: A Guide for Campaign Planners, Part of Optimizing Healthcare Workers Interpandemic Vaccine Uptake Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2010 to 2012Enrolled46ConditionsInfluenzaArmsIntervention Group, Control Group
NCT01207557 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of the Ottawa Influenza Decision Aid - A Component of the "Optimizing Healthcare Workers Interpandemic Vaccine Uptake in Acute and Long-term Care" CIHR Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2009 to 2010Enrolled300ConditionsInfluenzaArmsStandard Education Only, Standard Education Plus OIDA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Po-Po LamElisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Larry W Chambers
Donna M Pierrynowski MacDougall
Anne E McCarthy

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, vaccination coverage for seasonal influenza among health care personnel remains below 50%. The objective of this review was to determine which seasonal influenza vaccination campaign or campaign components in health care settings were significantly associated with increases in influenza vaccination among staff.

methodsWe identified articles in eight electronic databases and included randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies and studies with interrupted time series designs in our review. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data and assessed the risk of biases. We calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for randomized controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies and described interrupted time series studies.

resultsWe identified 99 studies evaluating influenza vaccination campaigns for health care workers, but only 12 of the studies were eligible for review. In nonhospital health care settings, including long-term care facilities, campaigns with a greater variety of components (including education or promotion, better access to vaccines, legislation or regulation and/or role models) were associated with higher risk ratios (i.e, favouring the intervention group). Within hospital settings, the results reported for various types of campaigns were mixed. Many of the criteria for assessing risk of bias were not reported.

interpretationCampaigns involving only education or promotion resulted in minimal changes in vaccination rates. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate components and combinations of components in influenza vaccination campaigns for health care personnel.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth PromotionBiasConfidence IntervalsHospitalsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesOdds RatioSeasonsWorkforceInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20643836
PMCPMC2934816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.