Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20643468›Full record

ArticleWater research2010

Large scale analysis of virulence genes in Escherichia coli strains isolated from Avalon Bay, CA.

Matthew J Hamilton, Asbah Z Hadi, John F Griffith, Satoshi Ishii, Michael J Sadowsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Virulence Factors in Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Is It Human or Animal? The Origin of PathogenicTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  9. Niche Preference ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-ThroughputFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Indicator bacteria community in seawater and coastal sediment: the Persian Gulf as a case.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J HamiltonDepartment of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, MMC 196, 420 Delaware Street, S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Asbah Z Hadi
John F Griffith
Satoshi Ishii
Michael J Sadowsky
University of Minnesota · USBiotechnology Institute · USSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project · US

Funding

TRAINING FOR FUTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTT32GM008347 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHMIDT-DANNERT, CLAUDIA · 1990 to 2021
$11.0M
Modeling Pheromone Induced Plasmid and Drug Resistance TransferR01GM081388 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HU, WEI-SHOU · 2007 to 2015
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 2T32-GM008347NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081388NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of recreational waters with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus sp. is a widespread problem resulting in beach closures and loss of recreational activity. While E. coli is frequently used as an indicator of fecal contamination, and has been extensively measured in waterways, few studies have examined the presence of potentially pathogenic E. coli strains in beach waters. In this study, a combination of high-throughput, robot-assisted colony hybridization and PCR-based analyses were used to determine the genomic composition and frequency of virulence genes present in E. coli isolated from beach water in Avalon Bay, Santa Catalina Island, CA. A total of 24,493 E. coli isolates were collected from two sites at a popular swimming beach between August through September 2007 and from July through August 2008. All isolates were examined for the presence of shiga-like toxins (stx1/stx2), intimin (eaeA), and enterotoxins (ST/LT). Of the 24,493 isolates examined, 3.6% contained the eaeA gene, indicating that these isolates were potential EPEC strains. On five dates, however, greater than 10% of the strains were potential EPEC, suggesting that incidence of virulence genes at this beach has a strong temporal component. No STEC or ETEC isolates were detected, and only eight (<1.0%) of the potential EPEC isolates were found to carry the EAF plasmid. The potential EPEC isolates mainly belonged to E. coli phylogenetic groups B1 or B2, and carried the β intimin subtype. DNA fingerprint analyses of the potential EPEC strains indicated that the isolates belonged to several genetically diverse groups, although clonal isolates were frequently detected. While the presence of virulence genes alone cannot be used to determine the pathogenicity of strains, results from this study show that potential EPEC strains can be found in marine beach water and their presence needs to be considered as one of the factors used in decisions concerning beach closures.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAdhesins, BacterialAnalysis of VarianceBathing BeachesCaliforniaDNA FingerprintingEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenes, BacterialGeographyPhylogenySeawaterVirulenceWater PollutionAdhesins, BacterialeaeA protein, E coliEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20643468
PMCPMC2952692
OpenAlexW2023153564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.