Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20643349›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2010

Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity.

Eric Theveneau, Lorena Marchant, Sei Kuriyama, Mazhar Gull, Barbara Moepps, Maddy Parsons, Roberto Mayor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 278 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 532 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning multiscale collective cell dynamics: From single-cell characterization to multicellular monolayer modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interactions Between Active Matters and Endogenous Fields.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  9. A thermodynamic perspective on mammalian neural crest ingression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Pattern formation along signaling gradients driven by active droplet behavior of cell swarms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From neural crest migration to the onset of gangliogenesis.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric TheveneauDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Lorena Marchant
Sei Kuriyama
Mazhar Gull
Barbara Moepps
Maddy Parsons
Roberto Mayor
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0801145Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directional collective migration is now a widely recognized mode of migration during embryogenesis and cancer. However, how a cluster of cells responds to chemoattractants is not fully understood. Neural crest cells are among the most motile cells in the embryo, and their behavior has been likened to malignant invasion. Here, we show that neural crest cells are collectively attracted toward the chemokine Sdf1. While not involved in initially polarizing cells, Sdf1 directionally stabilizes cell protrusions promoted by cell contact. At this cell contact, N-cadherin inhibits protrusion and Rac1 activity and in turn promotes protrusions and activation of Rac1 at the free edge. These results show a role for N-cadherin during contact inhibition of locomotion, and they reveal a mechanism of chemoattraction likely to function during both embryogenesis and cancer metastasis, whereby attractants such as Sdf1 amplify and stabilize contact-dependent cell polarity, resulting in directional collective migration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCadherinsCell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell PolarityCells, CulturedChemokine CXCL12ChemotaxisContact InhibitionEmbryonic DevelopmentModels, BiologicalNeural CrestReceptors, CXCR4XenopusXenopus ProteinsCadherinsChemokine CXCL12CXCL12 protein, XenopusReceptors, CXCR4Xenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20643349
PMCPMC2913244
OpenAlexW1974640915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.