Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20643312›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2010

Quantitative genetics in the era of molecular genetics: learning abilities and disabilities as an example.

Claire M A Haworth, Robert Plomin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic specificity of face recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From observational to dynamic genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2014
    Article
  13. The future of genomics for developmentalists.Development and psychopathology · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire M A HaworthSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, United Kingdom. Claire.Haworth@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Robert Plomin

Funding

Genetics, School environments and cognitive developmentR01HD044454 · NICHD · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI PLOMIN, ROBERT · 2005 to 2014
$3.4M
Medical Research Council G0500079Medical Research Council G0500079(73692)Medical Research Council G050079Medical Research Council G0802681Medical Research Council G19/2NICHD NIH HHS HD44454NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044454Wellcome Trust 084728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo consider recent findings from quantitative genetic research in the context of molecular genetic research, especially genome-wide association studies. We focus on findings that go beyond merely estimating heritability. We use learning abilities and disabilities as examples.

methodRecent twin research in the area of learning abilities and disabilities was reviewed.

resultsThree findings from quantitative genetic research stand out for their far-reaching implications for child and adolescent psychiatry. First, common disorders such as learning difficulties are the quantitative extreme of the same genetic factors responsible for genetic influence throughout the normal distribution (the Common Disorders are Quantitative Traits Hypothesis). Second, the same set of genes is largely responsible for genetic influence across diverse learning and cognitive abilities and disabilities (the Generalist Genes Hypothesis). Third, experiences are just as influenced genetically as are behaviors and genetic factors mediate associations between widely used measures of the environment and behavioural outcomes (the Nature of Nurture Hypothesis).

conclusionsQuantitative genetics can go far beyond the rudimentary "how much" question about nature versus nurture, and can continue to provide important findings in the era of molecular genetics.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableAdolescentChildCognition DisordersEpigenesis, GeneticForecastingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLearning DisabilitiesMolecular BiologySocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID20643312
PMCPMC2908597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.