Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20643076›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Structural insights into conformational stability of wild-type and mutant beta1-adrenergic receptor.

Gouthaman S Balaraman, Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Can Mutations Thermostabilize G-Protein-Coupled Receptors?Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops.British journal of pharmacology · 2012
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gouthaman S BalaramanDivision of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Supriyo Bhattacharya
Nagarajan Vaidehi
City of Hope · USBeckman Research Institute

Funding

Computationally Guided Design of Thermostable mutants of Neurotensin receptor1R01GM097261 · NIGMS · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI VAIDEHI, NAGARAJAN · 2011 to 2018
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent experiments to derive a thermally stable mutant of turkey beta-1-adrenergic receptor (beta1AR) have shown that a combination of six single point mutations resulted in a 20 degrees C increase in thermal stability in mutant beta1AR. Here we have used the all-atom force-field energy function to calculate a stability score to detect stabilizing point mutations in G-protein coupled receptors. The calculated stability score shows good correlation with the measured thermal stability for 76 single point mutations and 22 multiple mutants in beta1AR. We have demonstrated that conformational sampling of the receptor for various mutants improve the prediction of thermal stability by 50%. Point mutations Y227A5.58, V230A5.61, and F338M7.48 in the thermally stable mutant m23-beta1AR stabilizes key microdomains of the receptor in the inactive conformation. The Y227A5.58 and V230A5.61 mutations stabilize the ionic lock between R139(3.50) on transmembrane helix3 and E285(6.30) on transmembrane helix6. The mutation F338M7.48 on TM7 alters the interaction of the conserved motif NPxxY(x)5,6F with helix8 and hence modulates the interaction of TM2-TM7-helix8 microdomain. The D186-R317 salt bridge (in extracellular loops 2 and 3) is stabilized in the cyanopindolol-bound wild-type beta1AR, whereas the salt bridge between D184-R317 is preferred in the mutant m23. We propose that this could be the surrogate to a similar salt bridge found between the extracellular loop 2 and TM7 in beta2AR reported recently. We show that the binding energy difference between the inactive and active states is less in m23 compared to the wild-type, which explains the activation of m23 at higher norepinephrine concentration compared to the wild-type. Results from this work throw light into the mechanism behind stabilizing mutations. The computational scheme proposed in this work could be used to design stabilizing mutations for other G-protein coupled receptors.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AgonistsAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsMutationNorepinephrinePindololProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-1SaltsTransition TemperatureTurkeysAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AgonistscyanopindololMutant ProteinsNorepinephrinePindololReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-1Salts

Identifiers

PMID20643076
PMCPMC2905111
OpenAlexW2071710485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.