Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20642843›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2010

Linking sexual and reproductive health and HIV interventions: a systematic review.

Caitlin E Kennedy, Alicen B Spaulding, Deborah Bain Brickley, Lucy Almers, Joy Mirjahangir, Laura Packel, Gail E Kennedy, Michael Mbizvo, Lynn Collins, Kevin Osborne

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02994355 (HIV Testing at Family Planning Clinics in Mombasa County, Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02994355 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

HIV Testing at Family Planning Clinics in Mombasa County, Kenya: A Cluster-Randomized Trial Comparing the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) to Usual Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2018 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsHIVArmsSystems Analysis and Improvement Approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caitlin E KennedyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. ckennedy@jhsph.edu
Alicen B Spaulding
Deborah Bain Brickley
Lucy Almers
Joy Mirjahangir
Laura Packel
Gail E Kennedy
Michael Mbizvo
Lynn Collins
Kevin Osborne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe international community agrees that the Millennium Development Goals will not be achieved without ensuring universal access to both sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, care and support. Recently, there has been increasing awareness and discussion of the possible benefits of linkages between SRH and HIV programmes at the policy, systems and service delivery levels. However, the evidence for the efficacy of these linkages has not been systematically assessed.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the evidence for interventions linking SRH and HIV. Structured methods were employed for searching, screening and data extraction. Studies from 1990 to 2007 reporting pre-post or multi-arm evaluation data from SRH-HIV linkage interventions were included. Study design rigour was scored on a nine-point scale. Unpublished programme reports were gathered as "promising practices".

resultsOf more than 50,000 citations identified, 185 studies were included in the review and 35 were analyzed. These studies had heterogeneous interventions, populations, objectives, study designs, rigour and measured outcomes. SRH-HIV linkage interventions were generally considered beneficial and feasible. The majority of studies showed improvements in all outcomes measured. While there were some mixed results, there were very few negative findings. Generally, positive effects were shown for key outcomes, including HIV incidence, sexually transmitted infection incidence, condom use, contraceptive use, uptake of HIV testing and quality of services. Promising practices (n = 23) tended to evaluate more recent and more comprehensive programmes. Factors promoting effective linkages included stakeholder involvement, capacity building, positive staff attitudes, non-stigmatizing services, and engagement of key populations.

conclusionsExisting evidence provides support for linkages, although significant gaps in the literature remain. Policy makers, programme managers and researchers should continue to advocate for, support, implement and rigorously evaluate SRH and HIV linkages at the policy, systems and service levels.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesSexual BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID20642843
PMCPMC2918569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.