ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2010
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of asenapine in schizophrenia.
Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asenapine pharmacokinetics and tolerability in a pediatric population.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and safety of asenapine in Asian patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, 6-week, placebo-controlled study.Psychopharmacology · 2016Trial
- In Vitro Oral Cavity Permeability Assessment to Enable Simulation of Drug Absorption.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Treatment-resistant schizophrenia characterised by dopamine supersensitivity psychosis and efficacy of asenapine.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Transdermal Asenapine in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Review
- Potential of Oxytocin in the Treatment of Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2016Review
- Supersensitivity psychosis and its response to asenapine in a patient with delusional disorder.Case reports in psychiatry · 2014Article
- Newer antipsychotics and upcoming molecules for schizophrenia.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- Predictive animal models of mania: hits, misses and future directions.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
- The role of asenapine in the treatment of manic or mixed states associated with bipolar I disorder.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importance of the fieldAsenapine is a new atypical antipsychotic medication with high affinity for D(2) and 5HT(2A) receptors that has been approved by the FDA in adults for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in the USA. The purpose of this review is to describe the compound and examine whether it addresses some of the unmet clinical needs in treating schizophrenia. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The development of asenapine is described with attention to its chemistry, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile. Preclinical and clinical trials of safety and efficacy are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of asenapine relative to other antipsychotic medications are discussed. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Asenapine will be evaluated for whether it: i) causes a reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia; ii) has a side-effect profile minimizing extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain and cardiac effects; and iii) affects negative and/or cognitive symptoms. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Asenapine is a recently approved agent with an acceptable cardiometabolic profile and exhibits similar efficacy as other antipsychotic medications, primarily on positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Relatively less weight gain compared with other agents may confer a notable advantage. Sublingual administration may have positive and negative effects on patient compliance. Potential 'pro-cognitive' effects of asenapine are preliminary and require more investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.