Trial reportClinical cardiology2010
Postconditioning the human heart in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of ischaemic postconditioning on markers of myocardial injury in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.Open heart · 2024Pooled it
- Short-and long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning in STEMI patients: a meta-analysis.Lipids in health and disease · 2015Pooled it
- Postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Vascular health and risk management · 2014Pooled it
- Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2017Trial
- Effect of ischemic postconditioning on myocardial salvage in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the POST randomized trial.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015Trial
- Effect of ischemic postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI results of the POSTEMI (POstconditioning in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) randomized trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Trial
- The beneficial effects of postconditioning on no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2014Trial
- Therapeutic strategies to ameliorate mitochondrial oxidative stress in ischaemia-reperfusion injury: A narrative review.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025Review
- Reperfusion Injury: How Can We Reduce It by Pre-, Per-, and Postconditioning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Controlling Reperfusion Injury With Controlled Reperfusion: Historical Perspectives and New Paradigms.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Review
- Clinical Applicability of Conditioning Techniques in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Review of the Literature.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- Effect of hyperglycaemia and diabetes on acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by ischaemic conditioning protocols.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Review
- Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2020Article
- Mitochondria in Cardiac Postconditioning.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Limb Remote Ischemic Conditioning: Mechanisms, Anesthetics, and the Potential for Expanding Therapeutic Options.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
- Signaling Pathways in Cardiac Myocyte Apoptosis.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Ischaemic conditioning: pitfalls on the path to clinical translation.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Review
- Postconditioning signalling in the heart: mechanisms and translatability.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been proved in animal models that postconditioning (PC) could attenuate reperfusion injury. But there are not many clinical studies on the application of PC. HYPOTHESIS: Four cycles of 1-minute balloon inflation and deflation, following initial balloon reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) but before stenting, might improve clinical outcomes compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone.
methodsForty-three patients diagnosed with acute MI were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the control group (n = 20) and the PC group (n = 23). Blood samples were obtained and assayed for creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein. Electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and rest technetium Tc 99m-sestamibi (99mTc-MIBI) myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were performed.
resultsThe control group presented with higher peak CK-MB as compared with the PC group (351.9 +/- 153.6 vs 247.7 +/- 118.3 U/L, P = 0.028) as well as the area under the curve (AUC) of CK-MB (8040 +/- 3358 vs 5955 +/- 2509, P = 0.04). After PCI, PC was associated with a lower level of hs-CRP in comparison with the control group (5.5 +/- 4.5 vs 9.5 +/- 5.2 mg/L, P = 0.019). More patients in the PC group had complete ST-segment resolution than did patients in the control group (82.6% vs 45.0%, P = 0.049). Left ventricle ejection fraction was better in the PC group than in the control group (0.57 +/- 0.09 vs 0.47 +/- 0.11, P = 0.002). Compared with the control group, PC greatly reduced infarct size, by 46% as measured by SPECT (13 +/- 11.2% vs 24.2 +/- 10.6%, P = 0.002).
conclusionsThis study indicated that PC in emergent PCI was a valuable modification of primary PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.