Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20640941›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2010

Infant and childhood diet and type 1 diabetes risk: recent advances and prospects.

Jill M Norris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Development of a harmonized food grouping system for between-country comparisons in the TEDDY Study.Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jill M NorrisDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. jill.norris@ucdenver.edu

Funding

THE TEDDY STUDY - COLORADO CLINICAL CENTERU01DK063821 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REWERS, MARIAN J · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
NUTRITIONAL ETIOLOGY OF PREDIABETIC AUTOIMMUNITYR01DK049654 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NORRIS, JILL M · 1997 to 2011
$5.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049654NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by a preclinical period of autoimmunity. It is well accepted that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to disease risk. Given that type 1 diabetes, and its preclinical autoimmunity, appear early in life, infant and childhood diet have been implicated as potential initiating exposures in the etiology of the disease. Several publications in the past year have provided further evidence for existing hypotheses regarding the roles of wheat, cow's milk, omega-3 fatty acids, and the maternal diet during pregnancy. However, inconsistencies in findings between studies suggest the need for collaboration and standardization of study methods to move forward in research in this area. One such example of this is the TEDDY (The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young) study, which is an international, multicenter birth cohort study with standardized recruitment, dietary collection methodologies, and analytic approaches.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Gastrointestinal TractHumansInfantMilkRisk FactorsTriticum

Identifiers

PMID20640941
PMCPMC4443269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.