Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20640601›Full record

ArticlePituitary2010

The clinical significance of MIB-1 labeling index in pituitary adenomas.

Geeta Chacko, Ari G Chacko, Kalman Kovacs, Bernd W Scheithauer, Sunithi Mani, J P Muliyil, M S Seshadri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geeta ChackoSection of Neuropathology, Department of Neurological Sciences & Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, India. geetachacko@cmcvellore.ac.in
Ari G Chacko
Kalman Kovacs
Bernd W Scheithauer
Sunithi Mani
J P Muliyil
M S Seshadri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas are unique in several ways--they are rarely malignant and yet can be invasive of several compartments. Recurrences in tumors with bland histological features that have been radically excised are a reason for frustration faced by endocrinologists and neurosurgeons in treatment of pituitary adenomas. Several attempts have therefore been made to determine the growth potential of pituitary adenomas. The aim of the present study was to define the biological significance of the MIB-1 labelling index (MIB-1 LI) in pituitary adenomas. The study included 159 cases of surgically treated pituitary adenoma seen in a single institution. MIB-1 LI was not found to be related to age or gender. The mean MIB-1 LI for clinically functional adenomas was marginally higher than that for clinically non-functional adenomas. There was a significant difference in the MIB-1 LI for tumors with a maximum diameter of more than 4 cm at a MIB-1 LI of ≥2%, however this difference was not statistically significant at a higher MIB-1 LI cut off value of >3%. The mean MIB-1 LI was significantly higher in tumors causing hydrocephalus and in those with cavernous sinus invasion and not when invasion was defined as invasion by tumor in any direction. We conclude that large pituitary macroadenomas, tumors filling the third ventricle causing hydrocephalus and tumors with true cavernous sinus invasions are more likely to have a higher proliferation index. Close follow up of tumors showing these imaging features would be recommended.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsSex FactorsYoung AdultKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.