Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20640501›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2010

Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction.

Martin Graham Wilding, Clemente Capobianco, Nadia Montanaro, Genc Kabili, Loredana Di Matteo, Enrico Fusco, Brian Dale

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human embryo cryopreservation: one-step slow freezing does it all?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin Graham WildingCentro Fecondazione Assistita, Clinica Villa del Sole, Napoli, Italy. martinwilding@hotmail.com
Clemente Capobianco
Nadia Montanaro
Genc Kabili
Loredana Di Matteo
Enrico Fusco
Brian Dale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare embryo survival, pregnancy and implantation rates after cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage embryos with slow-rate cryopreservation or vitrification. STUDY

design262 patients, attending for assisted reproduction, were prepared for oocyte retrieval using standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols. Excess embryos were cryopreserved on day 3 either by vitrification, or slow-rate cryopreservation in a programmable freezer. Cycles of thawing were monitored for thaw efficiency, pregnancy and implantation rates.

resultsClinical pregnancy and implantation rates were highly comparable between cycles in which day 3 embryos were thawed either after slow-rate cryopreservation or vitrification.

conclusionsThese data suggest that vitrification of human embryos during assisted reproduction cycles achieves comparable success rates to fresh cycles and therefore can be applied in the laboratory of assisted reproduction.

Indexed as

Cleavage Stage, OvumEmbryo ImplantationVitrificationCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateProspective StudiesReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID20640501
PMCPMC2965340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.