Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20637909›Full record

ReviewJournal of proteomics2010

It's the machine that matters: Predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks.

Peggy I Wang, Edward M Marcotte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peggy I WangCenter for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1064, USA. peggywang@mail.utexas.edu
Edward M Marcotte
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Proteomics of widespread, reversible protein assemblies in aging and aggregationR01GM076536 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2006 to 2014
$2.9M
Reconstructing the eukaryotic cell cycle gene networkR01GM067779 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2004 to 2012
$2.1M
Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models by orthologous phenotypesR01GM088624 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067779NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076536NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing knowledge about the organization of proteins into complexes, systems, and pathways has led to a flowering of theoretical approaches for exploiting this knowledge in order to better learn the functions of proteins and their roles underlying phenotypic traits and diseases. Much of this body of theory has been developed and tested in model organisms, relying on their relative simplicity and genetic and biochemical tractability to accelerate the research. In this review, we discuss several of the major approaches for computationally integrating proteomics and genomics observations into integrated protein networks, then applying guilt-by-association in these networks in order to identify genes underlying traits. Recent trends in this field include a rising appreciation of the modular network organization of proteins underlying traits or mutational phenotypes, and how to exploit such protein modularity using computational approaches related to the internet search algorithm PageRank. Many protein network-based predictions have recently been experimentally confirmed in yeast, worms, plants, and mice, and several successful approaches in model organisms have been directly translated to analyze human disease, with notable recent applications to glioma and breast cancer prognosis.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsDiseaseHumansNeoplasmsProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20637909
PMCPMC2953423
OpenAlexW2068590125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.