Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20637093›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2010

Genome-wide search for breast cancer linkage in large Icelandic non-BRCA1/2 families.

Adalgeir Arason, Haukur Gunnarsson, Gudrun Johannesdottir, Kristjan Jonasson, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Bjarni A Agnarsson, Göran Jönsson, Katri Pylkäs, Aki Mustonen and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TheGenes · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Adalgeir ArasonDepartment of Pathology, Landspitali-LSH v/Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland. adalgeir@landspitali.is
Haukur Gunnarsson
Gudrun Johannesdottir
Kristjan Jonasson
Pär-Ola Bendahl
Elizabeth M Gillanders
Bjarni A Agnarsson
Göran Jönsson
Katri Pylkäs
Aki Mustonen
Tuomas Heikkinen
Kristiina Aittomäki
Carl Blomqvist
Beatrice Melin
Oskar T H Johannsson
Pål Møller
Robert Winqvist
Heli Nevanlinna
Ake Borg
Rosa B Barkardottir
National University Hospital of Iceland · ISHelsinki University Hospital · FILund University · SEOulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Iceland · ISNational Human Genome Research Institute · USOslo University Hospital · NOUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA significant proportion of high-risk breast cancer families are not explained by mutations in known genes. Recent genome-wide searches (GWS) have not revealed any single major locus reminiscent of BRCA1 and BRCA2, indicating that still unidentified genes may explain relatively few families each or interact in a way obscure to linkage analyses. This has drawn attention to possible benefits of studying populations where genetic heterogeneity might be reduced. We thus performed a GWS for linkage on nine Icelandic multiple-case non-BRCA1/2 families of desirable size for mapping highly penetrant loci. To follow up suggestive loci, an additional 13 families from other Nordic countries were genotyped for selected markers.

methodsGWS was performed using 811 microsatellite markers providing about five centiMorgan (cM) resolution. Multipoint logarithm of odds (LOD) scores were calculated using parametric and nonparametric methods. For selected markers and cases, tumour tissue was compared to normal tissue to look for allelic loss indicative of a tumour suppressor gene.

resultsThe three highest signals were located at chromosomes 6q, 2p and 14q. One family contributed suggestive LOD scores (LOD 2.63 to 3.03, dominant model) at all these regions, without consistent evidence of a tumour suppressor gene. Haplotypes in nine affected family members mapped the loci to 2p23.2 to p21, 6q14.2 to q23.2 and 14q21.3 to q24.3. No evidence of a highly penetrant locus was found among the remaining families. The heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) at the 6q, 2p and 14q loci in all families was 3.27, 1.66 and 1.24, respectively. The subset of 13 Nordic families showed supportive HLODs at chromosome 6q (ranging from 0.34 to 1.37 by country subset). The 2p and 14q loci overlap with regions indicated by large families in previous GWS studies of breast cancer.

conclusionsChromosomes 2p, 6q and 14q are candidate sites for genes contributing together to high breast cancer risk. A polygenic model is supported, suggesting the joint effect of genes in contributing to breast cancer risk to be rather common in non-BRCA1/2 families. For genetic counselling it would seem important to resolve the mode of genetic interaction.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 14Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6Family HealthFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesHumansIcelandLod ScoreBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID20637093
PMCPMC2949638
OpenAlexW2143830098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.