Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20635143›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Preoperative biliary drainage before resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: whether or not? A systematic review.

Fei Liu, Ya Li, Yonggang Wei, Bo Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Trans-papillary bilio-pancreatic stenting: When how and which stent.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The endoscopist and malignant and non-malignant biliary obstruction.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2018
    Review
  16. Resection for Klatskin tumors: technical complexities and results.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Preoperative Cholangitis Affects Survival Outcome in Patients with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  19. Common controversies in management of biliary strictures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fei LiuDepartment of Liver and Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ya Li
Yonggang Wei
Bo Li
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe value of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) before resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is still controversial nowadays. The objective of this review is to summarize quantitatively the evidence related to this issue.

methodsTwo investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase, Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Chinese BioMedical Literature on disc (CBMdisc), and Chinese Medical Current Contents (CMCC) databases. Eleven studies with a total number of 711 HCCA cases were included. Comparison was made of PBD versus no PBD in HCCA patients undergoing surgical resection. Outcome measures were postoperative complications, in-hospital death rate, postoperative infectious complications, and postoperative hospital stay.

resultsThere was no difference in death rate or postoperative hospital stay between the two treatment modalities. However, the overall postoperative complication rate and postoperative infectious complication rate were significantly adversely affected by PBD compared with surgery without PBD. In postoperative complications analysis, ten studies including 442 patients who underwent PBD and 233 patients who had no PBD were estimated. The odds ratio (OR) for postoperative morbidity was 1.67: 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.17, 2.39]. In postoperative mortality analysis, ten studies including 422 patients who underwent PBD and 238 patients who had no PBD were estimated. The OR for postoperative mortality was 0.70: 95% CI [0.41, 1.19]. In postoperative infectious complications analysis, five studies including 134 patients who underwent PBD and 122 patients who had no PBD were estimated. The OR for infectious morbidity was 2.17: 95% CI [1.24, 3.80]. In postoperative hospital stay analysis, only three studies with 84 patients who underwent PBD and 65 patients who had no PBD were estimated; the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative hospital stay was 5.37 days: 95% CI [-1.78, 12.52 days].

conclusionsThis systematic review could not provide evidence for a clinical benefit of using PBD in jaundiced patients with HCCA planned for surgery. Preoperative drainage should not routinely be performed in patients with proximal bile duct cancer scheduled for surgical resection. Because of the lack of uniformity of this analysis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample size and improved PBD techniques should be carried out to confirm our results.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaDrainageFemaleHumansJaundice, ObstructiveLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20635143
OpenAlexW1988457654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.