Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20635002›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for the Burkholderia cepacia complex.

Josée Castonguay-Vanier, Ludovic Vial, Julien Tremblay, Eric Déziel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. UnravelingmSystems · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A CRISPR-Cas-associated transposon system for genome editing inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Infection and immunity · 2023
    Review
  6. Methodological tools to study species of the genus Burkholderia.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  7. Functional Analysis of Phenazine Biosynthesis Genes inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Drosophila melanogaster host model.Journal of oral microbiology · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josée Castonguay-VanierInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique-Institut Armand Frappier, Laval, Canada.
Ludovic Vial
Julien Tremblay
Eric Déziel
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-77642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonization with bacterial species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is associated with fast health decline among individuals with cystic fibrosis. In order to investigate the virulence of the Bcc, several alternative infection models have been developed. To this end, the fruit fly is increasingly used as surrogate host, and its validity to enhance our understanding of host-pathogen relationships has been demonstrated with a variety of microorganisms. Moreover, its relevance as a suitable alternative to mammalian hosts has been confirmed with vertebrate organisms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe aim of this study was to establish Drosophila melanogaster as a surrogate host for species from the Bcc. While the feeding method proved unsuccessful at killing the flies, the pricking technique did generate mortality within the populations. Results obtained with the fruit fly model are comparable with results obtained using mammalian infection models. Furthermore, validity of the Drosophila infection model was confirmed with B. cenocepacia K56-2 mutants known to be less virulent in murine hosts or in other alternative models. Competitive index (CI) analyses were also performed using the fruit fly as host. Results of CI experiments agree with those obtained with mammalian models. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that Drosophila is a useful alternative infection model for Bcc and that fly pricking assays and competition indices are two complementary methods for virulence testing. Moreover, CI results indicate that this method is more sensitive than mortality tests.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBurkholderia cepacia complexDrosophila melanogasterVirulence

Identifiers

PMID20635002
PMCPMC2902503
OpenAlexW2127952389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.