ArticleThe patient2009
First Things First: Difficulty with Current Medications Is Associated With Patient Willingness to Add New Ones.
Article in The patient, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients' Perceived Importance of Medication and Adherence in Polypharmacy, a Quantitative, Cross-Sectional Study Using a Questionnaire Administered in Three Doctors' Private Practices in France.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2023Article
- How is Patient Adherence Possible? A Novel Mechanistic Model of Adherence Based on Humanities.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Review
- An Unsafe/Safe Typology in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Bridging Patients' Expectations, Personality Traits, Medication Adherence, and Clinical Outcomes.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Intentionality in adherence to long-term therapies. Results from an online survey of 3,001 patients with cardio-metabolic pathologiesPatient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Patient education, nudge, and manipulation: defining the ethical conditions of the person-centered model of care.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Impact of delaying blood pressure control in patients with Type 2 diabetes: results of a decision analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
- Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Gender differences in appraisal of stress and coping 5 years after heart transplantation.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInadequate blood pressure (BP) control remains prevalent. One proposed explanation is "clinical inertia," often defined as the failure by providers to initiate or intensify medication therapy when otherwise appropriate. However, patients could contribute to clinical inertia by signaling an unwillingness to consider medication intensification.
objectiveTo explore covariates of patient attitudes regarding medication intensification. STUDY
designCross-sectional survey.
setting9 Midwestern U. S. Veterans' Administration medical facilities.
participants1,062 diabetics identified as having BP>= 140/90 mm Hg as part of a prospective cohort study of clinical inertia in hypertension treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was participants' indicated willingness to intensify BP medications if their provider noted elevated BP levels. Potential covariates assessed included BP control (actual and perceived), perceived importance of BP control, BP management self-efficacy, competing demands, medication factors (adherence and management issues), trust in provider, and sociodemographic factors.
resultsWhile 64% of participants reported complete willingness to intensify BP medications, 36% of participants expressed at least some unwillingness. In ordered logistic regression analysis, willingness to intensify was negatively associated with medication concerns, particularly concern about side effects (OR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.59) and adherence or management problems (OR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.91), and positively associated with perceived dependence of health on BP medications (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.26, 1.79) and trust in provider (OR=1.30, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.54). Importance of BP control had a weaker, non-significant association with willingness to intensify as well (OR=1.17, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.40). Neither competing demands, current BP control, current number of medications prescribed, nor self-efficacy was associated with willingness to intensify medications.
conclusionsPatients' willingness to consider intensification of BP medications appears primarily determined by how well patients are managing their current medications, rather than patients' perceived importance of BP control, their self-efficacy, or their prioritization of BP control versus other health demands. Greater attention to patients' pre-existing medication issues may improve providers' ability to intensify BP medication therapy when medically appropriate while simultaneously improving patient satisfaction with care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.