Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20634957›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Visualizing early splenic memory CD8+ T cells reactivation against intracellular bacteria in the mouse.

Marc Bajénoff, Emilie Narni-Mancinelli, Frédéric Brau, Grégoire Lauvau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Memory CD8Science advances · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses duringMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Article
  8. IL-21 Expands HIV-1-Specific CD8Journal of immunology research · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms of Memory T Cell Activation and Effective Immunity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc BajénoffInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 924, Groupe Avenir, Valbonne, France. bajenoff@ciml.univ-mrs.fr
Emilie Narni-Mancinelli
Frédéric Brau
Grégoire Lauvau
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory CD8(+) T cells represent an important effector arm of the immune response in maintaining long-lived protective immunity against viruses and some intracellular bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (L.m). Memory CD8(+) T cells are endowed with enhanced antimicrobial effector functions that perfectly tail them to rapidly eradicate invading pathogens. It is largely accepted that these functions are sufficient to explain how memory CD8(+) T cells can mediate rapid protection. However, it is important to point out that such improved functional features would be useless if memory cells were unable to rapidly find the pathogen loaded/infected cells within the infected organ. Growing evidences suggest that the anatomy of secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) fosters the cellular interactions required to initiate naive adaptive immune responses. However, very little is known on how the SLOs structures regulate memory immune responses. Using Listeria monocytogenes (L.m) as a murine infection model and imaging techniques, we have investigated if and how the architecture of the spleen plays a role in the reactivation of memory CD8(+) T cells and the subsequent control of L.m growth. We observed that in the mouse, memory CD8(+) T cells start to control L.m burden 6 hours after the challenge infection. At this very early time point, L.m-specific and non-specific memory CD8(+) T cells localize in the splenic red pulp and form clusters around L.m infected cells while naïve CD8(+) T cells remain in the white pulp. Within these clusters that only last few hours, memory CD8(+) T produce inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-gamma and CCL3 nearby infected myeloid cells known to be crucial for L.m killing. Altogether, we describe how memory CD8(+) T cells trafficking properties and the splenic micro-anatomy conjugate to create a spatio-temporal window during which memory CD8(+) T cells provide a local response by secreting effector molecules around infected cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChemokine CCL3Flow CytometryInterferon-gammaListeria monocytogenesListeriosisL-SelectinMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, CCR7SpleenChemokine CCL3Interferon-gammaL-SelectinReceptors, CCR7

Identifiers

PMID20634957
PMCPMC2902518
OpenAlexW2081318754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.