Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20634919›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology : CIBCB. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology2006

Understanding the Evolutionary Process of Grammatical Evolution Neural Networks for Feature Selection in Genetic Epidemiology.

Alison A Motsinger, David M Reif, Scott M Dudek, Marylyn D Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology : CIBCB. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-wide investigation of genetic changes during modern breeding of Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Linkage Disequilibrium in Genetic Association Studies Improves the Performance of Grammatical Evolution Neural Networks.Proceedings of the ... IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology : CIBCB. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison A Motsinger
David M Reif
Scott M Dudek
Marylyn D Ritchie

Funding

PHARMACOGENOMICS OF ARRHYTHMIA THERAPYU01HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2001 to 2009
$24.8M
Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
Revealing Epistasis in Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG020135 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, EDEN R. · 2002 to 2006
$2.7M
Genetics Training Program: Implications of VariationT32GM062758 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS III, JOHN ATLAS · 2001 to 2005
$946k
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL065962NHLBI NIH HHS U19 HL065962NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020135NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM062758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of genetic factors/features that predict complex diseases is an important goal of human genetics. The commonality of gene-gene interactions in the underlying genetic architecture of common diseases presents a daunting analytical challenge. Previously, we introduced a grammatical evolution neural network (GENN) approach that has high power to detect such interactions in the absence of any marginal main effects. While the success of this method is encouraging, it elicits questions regarding the evolutionary process of the algorithm itself and the feasibility of scaling the method to account for the immense dimensionality of datasets with enormous numbers of features. When the features of interest show no main effects, how is GENN able to build correct models? How and when should evolutionary parameters be adjusted according to the scale of a particular dataset? In the current study, we monitor the performance of GENN during its evolutionary process using different population sizes and numbers of generations. We also compare the evolutionary characteristics of GENN to that of a random search neural network strategy to better understand the benefits provided by the evolutionary learning process-including advantages with respect to chromosome size and the representation of functional versus non-functional features within the models generated by the two approaches. Finally, we apply lessons from the characterization of GENN to analyses of datasets containing increasing numbers of features to demonstrate the scalability of the method.

Identifiers

PMID20634919
PMCPMC2903766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.