Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20634455›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces.

Takemi Sugiyama, Jacinta Francis, Nicholas J Middleton, Neville Owen, Billie Giles-Corti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Connectedness among Urban Parks from the Users' Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The mortality impacts of greening Italy.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takemi SugiyamaCancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland Public Health Building, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006 Australia. t.sugiyama@uq.edu.au
Jacinta Francis
Nicholas J Middleton
Neville Owen
Billie Giles-Corti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined associations of attractiveness, size, and proximity of multiple neighborhood open spaces (NOSs) with recreational walking.

methodsAdults participating in the Residential Environments (RESIDE) study (n=1366) in Perth, Australia, reported time spent engaging in recreational walking within their neighborhoods. Park audit data and geographic information systems were used to identify the most attractive, largest, and nearest NOS within a 1.6-km radius from each participant's residential location. Regression analysis was used to examine attributes (attractiveness, size, and proximity) of these open spaces and their associations with participants' recreational walking.

resultsShorter distance to attractive open spaces was associated with doing any recreational walking, but adults with larger attractive open spaces within 1.6 km of their home were more likely to walk 150 minutes or more in a week.

conclusionsFor adults, the presence of a large, high-quality park within walking distance of one's home may be more important in promoting sufficient amounts of walking for health benefits than is the presence of an open space within a shorter distance.

Indexed as

Leisure ActivitiesResidence CharacteristicsWalkingAdultFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesWestern Australia

Identifiers

PMID20634455
PMCPMC2920990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.