Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20634446›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

Bridging the gap: using school-based health services to improve chlamydia screening among young women.

Rebecca A Braun, Jackie M Provost

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Research on Clinical Preventive Services for Adolescents and Young Adults: Where Are We and Where Do We Need to Go?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of public schools in HIV prevention: perspectives from African Americans in the rural South.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2012
    Article
  9. Chlamydia screening: what about the men?American journal of public health · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca A BraunClinical and Community Health Programs Division, California Family Health Council, 2550 9th St, Suite 110, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA. braunr@cfhc.org
Jackie M Provost
California Family Health Council · US

Funding

PS09-902 COMPREHENSIVE STD PREVENTION SYSTEMS (CSPS)H25PS001379 · PS · CA ST DEPT OF HLTH SRVS--STD CNTRL BRNCH · PI BAUER, HEIDI · 2009 to 2013
$28.9M
COMPREHENSIVE STD PREVENTION SYSTEMS (CSPS)H25PS001391 · PS · LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT · PI MESTA, JOHN M. · 2009 to 2013
$19.1M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS 5H25PS001379NCHHSTP CDC HHS 5H25PS001391NCHHSTP CDC HHS H25 PS001379NCHHSTP CDC HHS H25 PS001391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe implemented a chlamydia screening program targeted at young women accessing reproductive health care services in a school-based setting, and we assessed racial/ethnic factors associated with infection.

methodsThe California Family Health Council partnered with 9 health care agencies receiving federal Title X family planning funding and 19 educational institutions to implement the Educational Partnerships to Increase Chlamydia Screening (EPICS) program from January 2008 through December 2008.

resultsEPICS agencies provided reproductive health services to 3396 unique sexually active females, 85% of whom self-reported no other source for reproductive health care. Chlamydia screening was provided to 3026 clients (89.1% chlamydia screening coverage). Of those screened for chlamydia, 5.6% tested positive. Clients who were African American (odds ratio [OR]=7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.9, 14.3), Pacific Islander (OR=4.1; 95% CI=1.1, 15.5), or Asian (OR=3.3; 95% CI=1.4, 8.1) were more likely to have a positive test than were White clients.

conclusionsChlamydia screening programs implemented in school-based settings have the capacity to identify and treat a significant amount of asymptomatic infection in a population that otherwise may not be reached. To facilitate screening, school-based clinics should implement outreach strategies that target their school population and clinical strategies that maximize opportunities for screening.

Indexed as

AdolescentCaliforniaChlamydia InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPrevalenceRisk FactorsSchool Health ServicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20634446
PMCPMC2920967
OpenAlexW2101584597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.