Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20634202›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2011

Constituent country inequalities in myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in men and women in the United Kingdom, 1996-2005.

A R Davies, E Grundy, D Nitsch, L Smeeth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A R DaviesCentre for Population Studies, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. alisha.davies@nhs.net
E Grundy
D Nitsch
L Smeeth

Funding

Wellcome Trust 082178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding myocardial infarction (MI) incidence and case fatality trends across the four UK constituent countries is of importance following devolution of the government of health-care services.

methodsRetrospective cohort study using a primary care database (5.19 million patients) examining trends in incidence of first MI and 30-day case fatality.

resultsFrom 1996 to 2005, the incidence of MI decreased in all countries, but reductions were greater in England (men, -3.1%; women, -2.8%) and Wales (men, -3.3%; women, -4.6%) than in Scotland (men, -1.9%; women, -0.6%) and Northern Ireland (men no change, women, -0.8%) (average annual percentage change). Greater reductions in England and Wales than Scotland and Northern Ireland meant a widening of north-south difference in MI incidence over the study period. Downward trends in 30-day case fatality were found in each country but less regional variation was evident (England men, -12.0%, women, -11.0%; Wales men, -18.4%, women, -12.6%; Scotland men, -9.5%, women, -9.0%; Northern Ireland men, -8.6%, women, -13.0%).

conclusionFrom 1996 to 2005, downward trends in the incidence of first MI and 30-day case fatality were evident in each constituent country. Greater improvements in case fatality, compared with incidence, were found within each country.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDatabases, FactualEnglandFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMortalityMyocardial InfarctionNorthern IrelandRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20634202
PMCPMC3043643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.